Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

B+ voltage discrepancies between rect tubes
#1

Have two NOS tubes one is a US NAVY 5Y3 and the other is a ken rad 5Y3. The radio works fine with either but is this a common issue for these types of tubes? Let me know what you fellas think.
US NAVY 
Audio B+ 280
Rect B+ over 300 my meter only goes to 300
Rf, if, det, B+ 201
-------------------------------------
Ken rad
Audio B+ 249
Rect B+ 302
Rf, if, det, B+ 179
#2

Recently I’ve tested and swapped tubes in a few radios to get the best performance, or at least the theory that my radio is working better. I’ve measured AVC and Power Supply voltages too.

I’ve seen certain brands like National Union NIB and the like test not as good as some major brands. I think the way tubes were mass produced, they had minimum specs to meet, and if they did, out they went for sale. Military tubes are supposed to be built to better standards, so it’s possible that they can test better.

The bottom line, unless it’s a high end amplifier that needs matched pairs, most tubes are fine. Most radios will never notice the difference, even with a weak tube. You’d be surprised how good a radio with weak 45’s can still sound.

Tony

“People may not remember how fast you did a job, but they will remember how well you did it”
#3

What does schematic give for B+ reading?

US Navy mfg'd by?

May be a 5Y3/6087?

Tom
#4

says C.H.S. on the navy tube.
#5

CHS should be Chatham, basically Tung-Sol's division that produced mil spec and other speciality tubes.

Without knowing voltage specs, no clue if one is high or other is low. Not uncommon for B+ to vary 5-10v on different new tubes but 30v is excessive.

Tom




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Welcome to the Phorum, keithchip! How far you take a radio on cabinet restoration is a matter of personal preference. ...GarySP — 11:28 PM
48-482 rear panel help
I've recently finished the internal restoration of a locally purchased Philco 48-482. The cabinet is in ok shape except ...keithchip — 10:28 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome to the Phorum, Ken! Lots of help here for all of your restoration questions. Take care and BE HEALTHY! - Gar...GarySP — 07:59 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Thank you. I went to your online library and found 2 schematics. I will download and compare to components!Ken D. — 06:31 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
It is a 16B tombstone.morzh — 06:13 PM
Zenith H725
David - sorry, I reread your post and finally saw THD - now the % figures make sense. Thanks for explaining. The PSU...EdHolland — 06:06 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Hi Everyone, New member but have been reading this for awhile for tips! Vaccum tubes were before my time so bear with ...Ken D. — 06:03 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Thank you MrFixR55, I appreciate your comments very much. I do not detect much hum if any so I will be staying with the ...dconant — 05:15 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi DConant Yes, you can replace chokes with resistors.  You do stand the risk of increased hum.  the solution is to inc...MrFixr55 — 04:23 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>