Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Airline 04WG-731B
#1

I found this a few months back and will be restoring it with my friend RickH who is new to the radio addiction.  We'll work on it a bit each week.  Today was opening it up and seeing what we have.  The sticker in the shop said it "turns on" which I'm assuming means the pilot light lit up.  We did not power it up.  Here is a LINK TO THE SCHEMATIC.

The main surprise was that there was a 50L6GT tube in the spot for the 35L6GT output tube.  The 4 component electrolytic cap has been replaced and the power cord was spliced with a newer cord.  We'll test tubes and perhaps start recapping next time.  This 1941 set does have some of the poor rubber insulated wire that will also need replacing or resleeving, although it appears that some of that may have already been replaced.  There was also an asbestos sheet covering the entire base of the radio.  I've elected to take that out and dispose of it. The cabinet is not too bad but I think we will refinish it for the experience.

[Image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/gcj0werxsf15a2....jpg?raw=1]

[Image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/j0cw0wbhm47t6g....jpg?raw=1]

[Image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/h3a8mt5h3i25b6....jpg?raw=1]

[Image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/l06zlteaqhs7xk....jpg?raw=1]
#2

Simple case but stately, Wells made some decent stuff, 7 tubes w/sw band is nice. Like that early internal AM antenna, well preserved. 

Good luck, should be nice when done. Old Montgomery Wards, those were the days.  Icon_wink


Paul

Tubetalk1
#3

Quick call the police someone stole the 2nd IF transformer. Oh the designers did...

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#4

[someone stole the 2nd IF transformer]

Icon_lol I did not notice that until you pointed it out....
#5

Is that some duct tape I see under there. 

Paul

Tubetalk1
#6

Yes, good eye Paul.  The prior owner's replacement multi-cap electroytic can is "insulated" with it so the csn does not touch other parts.   Icon_eek

Thst will come out.
#7

Yeah that is some way to fit a twistlock in Icon_lol

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#8

This week's progress was checking tubes and starting on the capacitors. We got the replacement multicap can out and after getting the duct tape gunk off saw that an 80/80/50/50uF rated for 200v/200v/200v/50v was in there (original was 80/40/20/20 rated ?/?/?/?). Antique electronics has a 33/33/47 rated for 160v that I think I could use and then tack in an 80 separately.

Does anyone have a thought on whether the 160v rated caps are OK to use to replace the 40/20/20 sections...see schematic. Thanks!
#9

I went ahead and ordered the multi cap electrolytics at 160v rating although the single 80uF will be much higher rating because that's what I have and the 35L6GT tube that we'll need.

As I was going over the schematic, I realized that the person who had replaced the electrolytics previously (using that duct tape for insulation) also tied the can's common to chassis ground in addition everything else that is connected to the point "X" in the schematic.  The brown common wire went around the screw in the chassis and then to point "X".
[Image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a1cfvl59f8bjdm....jpg?raw=1]

I remember unscrewing the connection that was made and the remaning wire on the can still shows the loop around the screw  Icon_eek
[Image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/tfavcuzr3pfopv....jpg?raw=1]

I'm not sure I understand how it could ever have worked in that configuration but I'll leave that for Terry to comment on...  Icon_thumbup
#10

If I understand what you are saying correctly, the “X” point and the capacitors common negative were connected to the chassis. Point “X” is one side of the line So the 200k resistor would have been shorted out and you would have a hot chassis 

Steve

M R Radios   C M Tubes
#11

Yes Steve, that is correct. Point “x” was connected to the chassis when the previous repair was done.
#12

We did finish this Airline up. Since the multi cap electroytic was already missing and not available to stuff we went ahead and simply replaced components with modern ones rather than stuffing. Several of the wires needed to be replaced or sleeved as the rubber insulation was bad. Is now playing, not the best and much better with an external wire antenna attached in addition to the loop. The cabinet cleaned up nicely and after stripping off the lacquer, toning slightly and applying clear gloss lacquer, sanding and rub out it does look better than it did. On to the next project. Will be looking for a simple set for my buddy to do on his own as his first restore.

[Image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/llwz60kt29gasv....jpg?raw=1]
[Image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q0737teaivfkba....jpg?raw=1]
#13

That turned out really nice Bob!  Congrats to you and your friend on a job well done Icon_thumbup

John KK4ZLF
Lexington, KY
"illegitimis non carborundum"




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>