Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RCA T8-18
#16

Let us know how the Soviet/Russian 6E5C tubes work out. I'm thinking about trying a couple of those, and making adapters for them.

I've found that metal tubes usually (not always, but usually) cost less than their G or GT glass counterparts. I just bought several for my RCA C15-3 so it would have all metal as per original (save for the 6E5 and 5Z3, that is).

Seeing your work on this set is making me want to get started on my T8-14, but I still have a big Hammarlund HQ-129-X on the bench so the RCA will have to wait.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#17

Ron, you're doing great work on the Hammarlund. I'm anxious to know how it turns out for you. I love mine. Today my power resistors all arrived, so I'm going to install those. After that it's a little more work on the cabinet, and waiting for my tubes to arrive.
Mike
#18

All the under chassis work is done. The electrolytic condensers replaced, the power resistors are in. One thing I noticed when replacing the electrolytic condensers, the originals were Aerovox 8 MFD, 600 Volt condensers. They all appeared to be originals to the radio. Interestingly, the schematic calls for 2 10 MFD and one 18 MFD condensers! I replaced the originals with 2 10 MFD and 1 20 MFD 600 Volt condensers per the schematic. I didn't bother re-stuffing the originals since there was plenty of room for the replacements under the chassis. As you all know, I am not one who tries to hide my work from the underside of the chassis. I figure, if someday someone else has to work on this radio, it is better if they know what has already been done.
#19

Sounds like you're not dealing with preserving an original set of filter condenser cans anyway Mike.  Good work!
#20

Thanks, Jake. Actually, I was able to leave the original cans in place, and put the 3 new electrolytics under the chassis. From the top it looks just like it did before, except it is a LOT cleaner. I even cleaned out the 3 sections of the variable condenser using isopropyl alcohol and Dill's pipe cleaners. Today I gave the case a second scrubbing with white Go-Jo and steel wool. Yesterday I gave it it's first rub down which got off a LOT of old dead finish, and a lot of yellow nicotine and dirt that had accumulated. I noticed that there were still some spots of white paint on it after that, so today I gave it a second scrubbing with the steel wool and got off all that paint. The case looks quite good. There are a few small areas where the veneer is chipped off on the sides, but I am going to leave them alone. I'll be the first to admit I am not really much of a wood worker. They are hardly noticeable, and are "battle scars" that I'm not too concerned about. I am not really trying to make this radio look new. I am just making it look presentable again, and making it work as well as it did when new. After it has dried for a few days I'll rub it down with a coat of tung oil, give that a few days to dry then repeat as necessary until the finish is restored.
#21

Sounds great!  Post some pics when convenient.
#22

Here is a picture of the chassis bottom, and 3 views of the chassis top, all done, ready to re-install except for new tubes.
[Image: https://66.media.tumblr.com/832d4beae289...1_1280.jpg]

[Image: https://66.media.tumblr.com/3d42cfadddfc...2_1280.jpg]

[Image: https://66.media.tumblr.com/28c416370ca2...3_1280.jpg]

[Image: https://66.media.tumblr.com/20609a22a09d...4_1280.jpg]
#23

Excellent pics bud.
I see you went with axial electrolytic caps.  I usually do also, but I sometimes struggle with that, wondering if radial electrolytics might have been a better choice in some given instance.  I somehow ended up with radials in my last project (Motorola 51x17), and it worked out well...no extentions needed.   I guess it depends on the particular points having to be reached.    Icon_thumbup
#24

I broke down and just ordered a new dial from Radio Daze. Mine is still legible, but is quite faded, so I figure I may as well break down and replace it, since I already did all the other work.
#25

Question: Does anybody know if this model, 8T-18, originally had decals on its front? I see no trace of any left. I have seen pictures of this model with an RCA Victor decal, and others without. Radio Daze carries a series of decals for the 8T  http://www.radiodaze.com/rca-3-sets-decals-dcl-rc-6k/   but I am not at all sure if they are correct for this model, or if it didn't have any decals on its front to begin with.[url=http://www.radiodaze.com/rca-3-sets-decals-dcl-rc-6k/][/url]
#26

Most I have seen online have a funky decal over the lower center knob, like here, 

https://radioattic.com/item.htm?radio=0650026

Paul

Tubetalk1
#27

I wouldn't really know.  The best I can add is my RCA has a decal on it's metal escutcheon, but it is NOT this model.   Icon_question
#28

I had an RCA T7 and it came with the original decals on it. It is possible that some had decals and some didn't.
 Her is my T7.
 Dan in Calgary.


Attached Files Image(s)
       

   Living in Calgary Alberta
#29

Hi Dan, thanks for the pictures ! They will be a great help. Actually, I believe your radio is a T8-18, like mine, not a T7. From all I have researched, the T7-5 did not have the magic eye, the T8-18 does, that is the only big difference in the circuits, other than the T7-5 uses at type 80 rectifier and the T8-18 uses a 5Z4, and, of course, the cases are noticeably different. I do notice slight differences in our two cases, but these are probably due to different runs of the model. There should be a paper label on the inside of the case which shows the tube layout, and also gives the model number.
#30

I don't have my RCA Red Books handy (they are downstairs and I am upstairs). The 1935 volume (1936 model year sets including mid-season 1935 models) includes black and white photos of all of the cabinets made that year. They all had the RCA Victor decal. Some had the C-B-A decal like Dan's (and my T7-5).

When I get a chance, I'll look at my 1936 volume (1937 model year including mid-season 1936 models such as your T8-18). It probably has a photo of your T8-18. It will tell what decals that set had originally.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>