Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Identifying 1938 resistors
#1

Can anyone provide a positive ID on these resistors?
They came out of my 38-3.
I believe the large one on the right is supposed to be a 7500 ohm and the smaller one on the left should be either 9 k or 32 k; I lean more toward 9 k.
Both of them currently measure at 10.15k and 10.21k respectively.


Attached Files Image(s)
   
#2

I would agree with your analysis! 7.5K and 9K.
#3

Thank you! So the large one is 7.5 k and the smaller is 9k. Wow. They've done a bit of drifting over the decades....
#4

https://philcoradio.com/library/index.ph...t-numbers/

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Thank you Ron! Very helpful! I'm curious though - why is the larger of the two resistors shown supposed to be 7500 k while the smaller is 9 k?
#6

and even smaller than the 9k is a 32k ohm resistor. It's kind of like wire gauges? The higher the gauge, the smaller the wire? So the higher the ohms, the smaller the resistor?
#7

The physical size of a resistor determines the power handling capability. The large resistor is capable of dissipating much more heat than the small one. It is, undoubtedly, used in the power supply section of the radio to drop the B+ voltage. Such an application may generate 2 to 5 watts. Much more than that and they usually would use a wire wound resistor because of its greater power handling capability. The smaller resistor is probably only capable of dissipating 1/2 watt of heat. You can easily find a 7.5K resistor that is the same size or even smaller physically than the 9K resistor. The amount of power that a resistor must dissipate is determined by the amount current that has to pass through it. That current is determined by the ohm value of the resistor and the voltage drop that occurs across it.
#8

Ok, now I remember. Hearkening back to my 9th grade science class!




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
If you want a radio that's difficult to work on, get a 37-620. The one side of the chassis is packed pretty tightly and ...Greg — 07:29 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 377 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 375 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>