Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

FM 100
#1

Listening to a Zenith from about 1950, band switch sez AM, then FM100. So why say FM 100, I have no other sets that have that mark. Ideas? Paul

Tubetalk1
#2

I'm listening to a Zenith 7H820.  This one has both the old FM band and the "new" one.  The old one is labeled FM 42, the new is labeled FM 100.  Perhaps yours is a carry over from older radios and people who remembered the old band.
#3

Maybe when the FM band went up in frequency and crossed 100MHz, they referred to it as FM100 to distinguish between the old and the new ones?

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#4

I am not that old that I remember old bandIcon_smile. Paul

Tubetalk1
#5

Zenith made several models in 1940s, my Spinet being one of those, with the old FM.
Dials were marked in numbers, not MHz.
I guess, once they migrated to the modern one, they tried to avoid confusion.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#6

These little Armstrong FM sets sound pretty good regardless. Paul

Tubetalk1
#7

I'm probably wrong:

"FM-42" designation is the first FM band beginning at 42Mhz, the band being obsolete many years. Incidentally some receivers were marked as "channels"...

"FM-100" is the current band, containing 100mhz. So, in simple terms the names are not identically representative of what they are.

Chas

Pliny the younger
“nihil novum nihil varium nihil quod non semel spectasse sufficiat”
#8

Our 1947 Zenith Console has both FM bands. IIRC the bandswitch indicator designates these FM 45 (may be 42) and FM 100. It reflects the frequency range for each, as pointed out before. The tuning dial on that radio is marked in frequency units for each band.

This also reflects the changes in radio that were happening at the time, and the battle for control of the commercial airwaves taking place between some of the technology's most notable figures.

I don't hold with furniture that talks.
#9

Thanks for all the feedback....no pun. Paul

Tubetalk1




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Note that no power cord, power switch, or power transformer switch are shown. That (along with my experience with full s...DaleHCook — 07:09 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
A pair of wire strippers can give you an idea of what the existing gauge of the wire leads are in the IF can, I think it...Arran — 06:07 AM
My last cabinet for this year
Hello Dan, That is really beautiful what great looking radio you have ! I have friends who live in Calgary and the wea...radiorich — 01:51 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>