Acoustic Clarifiers-Damping Element
Posts: 11
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2010
City: St. Charles, MO
I've searched and do not find any information on the damping element on the acoustic clarifiers. It seems that many of the calrifiers are subject to having the damping element melting and running down the metal frame and not being a part of the cone damping anymore. The damping element started life as a piece of rubber and turned into drippy rubber glue. My questions are: Is anyone familure with the sound of a cabinet with good clarifiers versus one with the damping element melted out? (relate a comparison) Next question: Has anyone attempted to replace the damping element on a clarifier? Next question: I have just finished replacing a damping element in a clarifier with a piece of rubber band and have taken pictures and documented the process: Would it be worthwhile to go to the trouble of writting it all up or has someone gone before me?
Thanks to all.
Posts: 76
Threads: 20
Joined: Oct 2010
City: Oskaloosa
State, Province, Country: KANSAS
Dom
I have replaced the rubber on the clarifiers. I followed this method from YouTube. You just use the silicone bands everyone seems to be selling and wearing now.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y42KmweyhMM
I have not put them back in my cabinet yet. Not quit done. Was not too hard to do.
Posts: 11
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2010
City: St. Charles, MO
Skip, thanks a bunch. I'll check it out.
Don
Posts: 162
Threads: 37
Joined: Oct 2012
City: St Louis MO USA
Don I've got five clarifiers at my house and all of them need this fix, if you hadn't mentioned this I would never have known this repair was required to get these to do the job they were designed to do. Thanks for bringing it to our attention .[Image: http://i1281.photobucket.com/albums/a508...d3ad01.jpg] my Philco 116x that looks like it has the rubber but I'm going to replace them anyway.
Posts: 11
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2010
City: St. Charles, MO
Ronin61, it looks like you and will be working on yours and mine together. My recent purchase of a 37-116 has the melted dampers on the clarifiers as well.
See you Monday
Posts: 1,114
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2013
City: Irvington, NY
I am not sure if the original material for the dampers was rubber or some other substance. The Philco patent for the clarifiers specifies "viscoloid" as the damping material, but I have not been able to find out if viscoloid was an early plastic or some rubber compound.
In any case, a replacement material has to be a lossy substance in that it should convert motion into heat. If it just stretches and rebounds as usual rubber does, then there will be no damping effect and it might as well not be there at all. If you are lucky enough to have clarifiers with intact damping material which has not disintegrated, it might be well to leave them as a sample of the characteristics of the damping as originally designed
Here is a link to the patent which goes into a lot of detail regarding the design of the clarifiers and how they work. Perhaps it will be of some help in choosing an effective modern replacement damping material.
http://www.google.com/patents?id=4KdBAAA...dq=2059929
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2013, 08:37 PM by Mondial.)
Posts: 1,190
Threads: 50
Joined: Oct 2017
City: Allendale, MI
Interesting! I suspect that the dried out paper of the cones and the deteriorated dampers significantly change the resonant frequency of the clarifier. I may have to play with one to determine the resonant frequency of the clarifiers on my 37 and 38-116's. If they can be brought back into the designed frequency, they may be more effective in reducing cabinet boominess. Thank you for the link to the original patent!
(This post was last modified: 10-13-2020, 10:21 PM by rfeenstra.)
Posts: 1,190
Threads: 50
Joined: Oct 2017
City: Allendale, MI
Wow! I just realized how old this thread is!
Posts: 140
Threads: 28
Joined: Dec 2016
City: portland, OR
whatever is the "resonant frequency of the clarifier?" and how would you find it??
Posts: 1,190
Threads: 50
Joined: Oct 2017
City: Allendale, MI
The resonant frequency is the frequency that the cone will want to vibrate at most easily. All speakers have a resonant frequency . it would have to be determined experimentally. The patent gives the desired/designed frequency. It would be interesting to compare actual "aged" frequency with original designed frequency. If the current resonant frequency is far away from the original, it may explain why some have said they are not very effective at reducing the boominess of the cabinet.
Posts: 140
Threads: 28
Joined: Dec 2016
City: portland, OR
And what would be the experiment to determine the resonant frequency of a speaker?? Are the patents with the designed frequency available somewhere?
Posts: 3,135
Threads: 54
Joined: Apr 2011
City: Lexington, KY
A link to the patent is listed in post #6 above. Just glancing through it looked like they were dampening frequencies 70 - 150 for one size of the clarifier.
John KK4ZLF
Lexington, KY
"illegitimis non carborundum"
Posts: 1,190
Threads: 50
Joined: Oct 2017
City: Allendale, MI
Normally tapping the cone will make it resonate. You could then measure the frequency from the voice coil. Since these have no voice coil, one can't do that. Perhaps, put it next to a speaker driven by an audio generator and sweep the frequency until the clarifier cone moves the most. that would be its resonate frequency. There are probably better ways, though.
Posts: 330
Threads: 30
Joined: Aug 2017
City: Hay Lakes, Alberta,Canada
I recently purchased a Canadian 3116X, and the "Viscoloid" is all but gone. But the Clarifiers in my U.S. 116X are all intact. Id like to get both sets working, and compare the two...
If replacing the rubber with silicone bands will work, I'm all for it. But if it won't make them resonate at the appropriate frequency, I'd too like to replace the rubber with a more appropriate material.
Posts: 330
Threads: 30
Joined: Aug 2017
City: Hay Lakes, Alberta,Canada
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
|
Recent Posts
|
|
Philco 38-7 Speaker
|
| 4-ohm speaker. Black, Green leads.tludka — 07:00 PM |
|
Philco 42-390, code 121 speaker
|
| #87 on the schematic.
This radio had a 8" Zenith speaker attached to it when I got it. I do don't know the hist...Stevelog — 06:39 PM |
|
Philco 60 Squealing
|
| I'm pretty sure I now have the litz wire soldered. This did not make any difference. Back in April I rewound the seconda...dconant — 06:25 PM |
|
Philco 38-7 Speaker
|
| Just to make sure, you chose either 4 ohm into 5K or into 10K? (blk-org or blk-grn)morzh — 06:23 PM |
|
Philco 38-7 Speaker
|
| I have let this one sit because of other duties. Now I am back, and I have a couple of questions. I hooked up a Hammond ...tludka — 05:34 PM |
|
Philco 42-390, code 121 speaker
|
| >>A closer examination of the very small print schematic indicates that the speaker is a PM type.
This shows a ...morzh — 05:18 PM |
|
Philco 60 Squealing
|
| Litz is typically tinned by simply rubbing it with the soldering iron tip while immersed in solder (and a bit of rosin f...morzh — 05:14 PM |
|
Philco 6K7
|
| The suppressor grid (if by G3 you mean the S) is usually at the Cathode potential, which in this caes is GND.
I am not ...morzh — 05:10 PM |
|
Philco 16B Parts
|
| Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately the radio was removed before bidding was over so I didn't get a chance to bid.dconant — 04:10 PM |
|
Philco 16B Parts
|
| Hi Dan,
Mike is correct, there's a lot of painted stuff on the chassis but it looks pretty good. The sm is all there,sp...Radioroslyn — 03:50 PM |
|
Who's Online
|
There are currently 3713 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 3711 Guest(s)
|
|
|
|
 
|
![[-]](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/collapse.png "[-]")
