Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model 90 1st RF question
#1

I noticed that the sensitivity of my 90 was not that great--big, local stations came in okay, but not the regional ones, and at night, only the big blow-torch stations came through, albeit very weakly. I tested my coils, and they all seemed okay, but I was still suspicious of the 1st RF, so I took it out and looked it over:[attachment=1]
Seemed okay, but it looks different than what most people describe as a 1st RF coil: the primary is inside the tube on its own spool. Here's what it looks like underneath: [attachment=0]

If I bypass this coil and hook the antenna directly to the 2nd RF, reception is much, much better, more sensitive and more clear. So there has to be something wrong with the 1st RF, right? But they all test continuous on my ohmmeter, and none of the coils shows more than 6.6 ohms resistance.

Question: how would I go about rewinding the primary on this coil? How do you get the center spool out of the form? Is this even the correct RF coil for this radio? Could someone have substituted it from something different? If the coil is okay, what could be causing the weak reception through it?

Lots of questions. Hope someone has some insight!

Mike
#2

That is very odd that your antenna coil would be, in essence, blocking reception if the continuity of both windings are good. Moisture absorption is the first thing that comes to my mind.

To answer your questions:

1. Once the primary is removed, you will be able to see the direction the turns need to be wound. I don't have my notes next to me, but it's either 200 or 250 turns of 38 gauge wire.

2. You remove the center spool by unsoldering the leads - first making notes on how the leads connect to the coil lug terminals, of course - then, using an instrument such as a socket wrench, gently pushing up on the spool. It is held in place by two tabs on top. One of the tabs may break; if it does, it can be glued back together.

3. Yes, it is most likely the correct coil, as the original antenna coil was made just as shown in your pictures.

4. While it is possible that someone could have substituted an incorrect coil, I sort of doubt it.

5. As I said, it could be moisture absorption. You might try baking the coil in your oven for 30 minutes at 180 degrees. This baking process is usually mandatory for Model 89 and 19 oscillator coils, and would certainly benefit other coils as well. Usually, a lightning hit will completely blacken that winding, and will normally make it go open as well.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

I had a similar problem with model 370 (model 70 chassis) It has the same style coil. Mine had a broken wire and I was able to resolder it. In your case If the continuity check ok than the problem isn't the coil. Would check the plate, screen grid, and cathode voltage of the rf amp tube. While you have the coil out check the resistance of the rf section of the tuning condenser (should measure open with the condenser all the way closed).Rf amp tube ok?
If you really think it is the primary of the coil, take a cardboard tube small enough to fit inside you rf coil and wind 50turns of small gauge magnet wire. With the set all back together take the coil you just made and place it inside the rf coil in the set. Take one of the wires from that coil and hook it to your antenna. It the reception is much better then it is the antenna coil.
Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#4

If you need to rewind this coil, a plastic sewing machine bobbin makes a good coil form.
Steve

M R Radios   C M Tubes
#5

Thanks for the feedback. I've learned through recent experience that a coil that shows continuity on an ohmmeter does not necessarily mean it's good. I had a similar problem with my recently completed 48-482: OK reception on the AM band, but not nearly as good as a radio with 3 IF amplifiers should have, so I tested everything again, and every one came up solid. My only clue was that when adjusting the IF padders during alignment, the 2nd primary made no difference no matter how tight or loose I adjusted it. Luckily, John Kendall had just the replacement can I needed, so when it arrived, I swapped it in immediately and voila! Sweet, strong reception all up and down the band, even though the original tested fine.

So I'm very anxious to test the improvised RF primary, as well as running through all the voltage tests on that stage, this weekend. Results to follow...
#6

I was going mention that that primary coil isn't very critical as it is used just to couple the rf energy to the secondary. The secondary is part of the tuned circuit, primary isn't. You could if you wanted to rewind it like the other coils with the primary on top of the secondary. Or you probably could use an ant coil from a model 20 or 70. The only thing that matters is at the tuning cap is the same value in mmfd's. Then it will tune the proper range.
Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#7

Did you ever find resolve for this issue? I have been looking for a 1st R.F. Transformer. For Philco Model 90 and 90A. Part # 03013. 2nd version chassis that uses one 47 as a single ended output. Mine is definitely bad and the inside coil is burnt, the outside coil is fine but I am unable to rewind it.

Can you bypass this coil? Heck I would even pay to ship this to someone who could rewind! If anyone has a spare, I’d gladly take it off your hands.

Thanks,

Brett
#8

You could try a 2.5 mh choke inserted into the open end as a primary. Secure with hot melt so it is an easy removal if need be.

Pliny the younger
“nihil novum nihil varium nihil quod non semel spectasse sufficiat”




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>