Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

help id this philco
#1

ok i have a philco 95 or so i believe it to be but if i am correct the 95 use two 45's this chassis has two 47's four 27's four 24's and one 80
help
#2

Sounds like a model 112 serial #174001 and higher.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

here are some pics i would agree but what about the 47s i found unless some put the wrong tubes in this that shows' 42s,44,and 37s


Attached Files Image(s)
           
#4

http://www.nostalgiaair.org/pagesbymodel...013118.pdf

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#5

I think you are right
#6

I try really I do....

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#7

looks like there is also a 112x
#8

It looks like a late 20s highboy cabinet, like a model 95 would use, with a 1931-33 pan type chassis, either a 111 or 112.
Regards
Arran
#9

Terry is correct, as is Arran - it is a late version 112 chassis. Notice the NORMAL - MAX. toggle switch on top of the chassis; only 112 chassis have this. Plus the five pin output tube sockets indicating 47 output tubes. Someone put that chassis in a 1929 Philco highboy cabinet. The chassis are the same size and have the same control shaft spacing so the 112 fits that cabinet without modifications.

It looks like whoever made the change installed a matching speaker from a 112, adding the risers from the original speaker.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#10

As much as it isn't the correct chassis for the cabinet, the 112 chassis is a "better" unit than the 87 (I believe) that should be in that cabinet, because it is a Superheterodyne design, with automatic volume control.

Unless you are an absolute purist, I'd restore the chassis and leave it in that cabinet. If you find the correct chassis later, it's easy to change. And it gives the poor chassis a warm home during this cold Covid winter.
#11

thank you ron
#12

and thank you brad
#13

I don't know, if you happened to find a model 95 chassis they were housed in the highboy cabinets as well, the performance between a screen grid TRF with push pull #45s, and a superhet with push-pull #47s is not going to be that noticeable, the audio quality may even be better with the prior. I can't remember if it was the model 95, or the 96, but at least the latter had an automatic volume control, which prevents being blasted on strong stations, which is the main complaint most people have about TRF sets. The only real advantage of the 112 is it's more selective, and the dial has better tracking then a TRF, but the sensitivity won't be any better, I'm not sure if the 112 covers the upper end of the B.C band or not. I'm not sure about the 112 chassis but Philco used to like running with triode connected #47s to reduce distortion, which #47s are notorious for.
Regards
Arran
#14

Good point - a model 95 chassis would be more "period correct" in that cabinet.

Both models 95 and 96 have AVC, as do models 111 and 112.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I've only run into a speaker with an open filed coil twice, and they were on newer speakers from the 1940s. One ...Arran — 12:48 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yes, this is my plan for now and what do I got to lose, this is not even the speaker from this radio, but one o...morzh — 10:44 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike;  I would unwrap the field coil, and see if maybe there a break near one of the ends, like where the coil wire att...Arran — 10:23 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
...and this is what I did. I fed a little LT into the screwholes with a small brush, and a little on the rim next to the...morzh — 09:52 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
I combined the two 40-120C threads together as we like to keep the discussion of the same radio together. It helps with...klondike98 — 09:36 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Just checked were I buy tubes price is four dollars. So living in Florid we have a local source for tubes. David    David — 09:14 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
The higher voltage may be due to higher mains voltage. My mains run 120-125AC when the set was new mains would be 110-11...David — 09:09 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Thank you for your reply. I pulled a speaker from a Philco 41-221 and received the same result. I used a signal tracer t...bluecap — 08:45 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Have you tried a different speaker? How did you trace the distortion? How do you know it is weak? What is the reference?...morzh — 08:33 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Amen to that! Every time I think I’ve captured them all, I realize that there’s another error. My goal is to finish with...jrblasde — 07:00 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>