Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Atwater Kent 82Q
#1

This is the battery version.
Same cabinet.
Is it worth it? I do want an 82 but I want an AC version.
There is one on CL now, cheap.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#2

If the cabinet is in good shape go for it, especially if it's cheap. I think the 82 is one of the nicest cathedral designs ever made. You've got a basement full of AC sets, you need at least one battery version of an old radio.

John KK4ZLF
Lexington, KY
"illegitimis non carborundum"
#3

Mike;
   I haven't gad a look at the schematic but many of those battery radios from the 1930s might surprise you for performance. One thing that they often have in their favor is lower hours then an equivalent AC radio, and a lack of heat, or high voltage, to stress things. If you had the AC version you would still need to take the power transformer out and replace the wires, as well as rebuilding the power supply, in a battery set you get to pick your own design since it's off board.
Regards
Arran
#4

By "cheap" I meant $125. For AK82 it is cheap.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#5

Yes, these days that is cheap. Go get it a'ready.

I used to own an 82-Q. Many, many years ago I was driving through Harrisburg, Illinois back when Illinois Route 13 ran along Poplar Street. I happened to glance over at a building and saw a cathedral radio in the window. Turns out it was an antique shop; I went back, went in, and bought the 82-Q for $75.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#6

In what condition is the cabinet? See if they will take less, $75-100, you never know, the fact it's a battery set goes against it in resale value, that and any early 30s radio is a harder sell these days.
Regards
Arran
#7

Well....the set being a battery one is what kept me from calling this guy who is close to where I work.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#8

Michael, two years ago I also looked very superficially at battery-powered radios ... But when I tried several radios, I was very pleasantly surprised by the lack of interference and clean reception. And anode batteries can be very easily made from 13 batteries from transistor pocket receivers such as " Крона ", you probably still remember them. Icon_mrgreen

Old Tube Radio Online Museum / Музей ретро радіо
https://www.youtube.com/user/RadioSvit?d...lymer=true

Sincerely Peter
З повагою Петро
#9

Peter

I believe I posted my portable Zenith and Stromberg Carlson restoration on your website Icon_smile
So yes, I am familiar with the today's way of making the batteries; I used 9V for Anode voltage and D or C size for heaters.
This said, "Krona" (9V), even today's alkaline re-incarnation of it, are not good to power heaters - it will drain those within very few hours.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
48-482 rear panel help
I also have one of these, again it never had a back, and no trace of one. I have been told that the pushbuttons used to ...Arran — 03:29 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks Joseph. Hope you get to restore your 48-482 before too long!keithchip — 02:12 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
RCAs ain't no cake either.morzh — 10:32 PM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
After a couple of days worth of troubleshooting my signal generator, I gave up. The oscilloscope still worked fine, so I...jrblasde — 09:51 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Yes, I can confirm. I bought one (haven’t restored it yet) which didn’t have a back panel.jrblasde — 09:37 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Try a 39-116.Radioroslyn — 09:24 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
I remember Philco 45 being awkward. If I am not mistaking it for some other set. I think there is a phenolic board, or e...morzh — 08:49 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
If you want a radio that's difficult to work on, get a 37-620. The one side of the chassis is packed pretty tightly and ...Greg — 07:29 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>