Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Update on transformers in 48-1270
#1

Update on transformers:

I replaced the output transformer with Hammond 125D. It works fine. Here's something to consider when using universal transformer. Initially, I missed the inverse feedback circuit implemented off the transformer secondary and missed the need to wire the secondary leads with regard to polarity. Of course, I got it wrong and had some pretty good high pitched oscillations when treble was high and volume low. I switched the leads so that the high side connects to the feedback circuit and that solved the problem. The oem transformer has one lead soldered to the transformer frame to prevent this mistake.

Regarding the power transformer, I purchased a tested replacement, but found that the DC resistance on its primary was about 2.8 ohms (just like the one in my radio). I bench tested it and all secondary voltages were pretty much on spec. So, that was encouraging. After recapping the radio, I powered up the radio with its original transformer slowly increasing voltage with variac and found no problems. The transformer output on all secondaries is pretty much per spec. So, it seems that the schematic showing the primary DC resistance at 28 ohms is incorrect.

The radio works okay on SW, AM, and FM. I will do the alignment in the next couple of days and then put it all back together. I really appreciate your help and all the other Phorum members - I've gleaned a lot of good information from a lot of previous posts.

I do have a question about alignment but will put that in a new post. Also, first chance I get I'll post pictures and some more restoration detail.
#2

So why exactly did you decide the power xfmr was bad? 2.8 Ohm primary? You could've asked here before buying the new one.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Welcome to the Phorum, keithchip! How far you take a radio on cabinet restoration is a matter of personal preference. ...GarySP — 11:28 PM
48-482 rear panel help
I've recently finished the internal restoration of a locally purchased Philco 48-482. The cabinet is in ok shape except ...keithchip — 10:28 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome to the Phorum, Ken! Lots of help here for all of your restoration questions. Take care and BE HEALTHY! - Gar...GarySP — 07:59 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Thank you. I went to your online library and found 2 schematics. I will download and compare to components!Ken D. — 06:31 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
It is a 16B tombstone.morzh — 06:13 PM
Zenith H725
David - sorry, I reread your post and finally saw THD - now the % figures make sense. Thanks for explaining. The PSU...EdHolland — 06:06 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Hi Everyone, New member but have been reading this for awhile for tips! Vaccum tubes were before my time so bear with ...Ken D. — 06:03 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Thank you MrFixR55, I appreciate your comments very much. I do not detect much hum if any so I will be staying with the ...dconant — 05:15 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi DConant Yes, you can replace chokes with resistors.  You do stand the risk of increased hum.  the solution is to inc...MrFixr55 — 04:23 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>