Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 90 restoration

Absolutely. If the value was critical, they put a variable cap in parallel with the fixed cap.

Yup, as Steve and Bob said. After all, these were consumer products, not scientific instruments. Usually "good enough" was...good enough. Icon_smile

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN

I watched a YT video from Mr Carlson last night on restoring an FADA radio. That's where I heard the comment. Doesn't mean he's right though! Maybe it was something unique to that manufacturer.

Could the components even be selected before the radios have been completed and powered up? Anyway, just think about the bottleneck this would create on an assembly line.

Steve

M R Radios   C M Tubes

The design engineers selected the components when they designed the circuits, prior to the beginning of production. Changes were (often) made during production, and these changes were then incorporated into production and usually (but not always, as we know) documented.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN

It just wouldn't be economically feasible to select components on the fly.

Steve

M R Radios   C M Tubes

Makes sense guys. Wow...these pictures on the Philco radio website are haunting. I live right outside of Philadelphia and know exactly where this area is.
https://philcoradio.com/library/index.ph...9-the-end/

I believe that the old style molded mica caps had a tolerance of + or - 5%, and since the values were usually posted right in the service data, either on the schematic or on an included parts list. Of course they also included trimmers, and padder condensers in series with, or in parallel with a coil to compensate for the variations in manufacturing tolerance between one coil and another, some would take shortcuts though and use fixed micas rather then trimmers. I've never worked on a Philco superhet of this era, but I have worked on RCA/G.E/Westinghouse sets, and it is possible to get the alignments on those almost bang on in terms of dial tracking.
Regards
Arran

Bob, PM'd you regarding your "parts chassis"
Thanks,
Simon

I'm calling the chassis done. It would be nice to have a matching pair of tube shields but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.

Next, I'll give the speaker my full attention.

[Image: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/5173...1586_c.jpg]

Hello Bob,
beautiful job!!

Sincerely Richard




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Shadow Meter Bulb
Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
3D-printing...short of machining, of course. Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6119 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 6118 Guest(s)
Avatar

>