Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 95 - 1st RF Transformer issues
#1

Hi all!

So recently I picked up a Philco Model 95 radio! It's in pretty good condition - at least on the outside  Icon_confused

Inside...

Philco 95 Gallery

It was dirty! A think layer of fine dust coated everything. I got all the tubes packed away - it did come with all of them! I brushed off as much of the dirt as I could.

Now on to the fun part  Icon_biggrin

I know it needs a total recapping. There are several newer caps, but most look original. I've found all the caps I need here: www.justradios.com
Is this a good source? Will I have any problem replacing all the caps with 630v metalized film caps? There are three that I need much smaller values than are available for film caps...50pF and 250pF - is it ok to use 500v dipped silver mica caps here?

I assume it also needs a full compliment of resistors...at least it will need something to replace this: 8300ohm Resistor

This appears to be a 8300 ohm resistor that has had some damage...the damage was all on the top of the resistor - looks like some arcing?
#2

Hi and welcome to the Phorum. So you can get your caps from quite a few good sources and which ones depends on how many radios you intend to restore. If you have several or more then buying the most used values in bulk (quantities of 10 or more) is the way to go. Your unit price will be close to half. If you're buying for one or two then you are on the right track. Yes, stay with the 630 volt film. The 8300 ohm resistor is a wire wound so try to find a similar wire wound at 10 watts (maybe 8000 - 8200). The rest of the resistors can be tested and if they are more than twenty percent out of tolerance (I use 10 percent) then replace them. Feel free to run any questions at the Phorum. You'll probably get more than one correct answer. GL with your 95.
#3

Wow. This radio was last repaired in 50-s. At that point these were often simply tossed. Someone was pretty fond of it.
And the exterior has been preserved remarkably well.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#4

I used to by caps from Just Radios. Nothing at all wrong with them. Later I began ordering in quantities of 50+ which I have been getting from Sal (link on ARF). Sal has some 500V electrolytics (FYI). BUT, a lot of restores would rather buy name brand electrolytics from Mouser. I think that the little 630V yellow caps are about the same anywhere.

As I recall, this radio has an additional RF amp. Mine is very sensitive on a short antenna.

My 95

Well. maybe not.

Doesn't seem to be a way to post a picture - now.

Russ

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/
#5

Russ I asked Nathan to check into the picture posting issue. Thanks!
#6

What are these:
   

The wiring diagram lists them as "compensating condensers", part # 3772-A...
#7

Looks like a mica capacitor. There's a thin slice of mica between the metal plates. If you trace the wires back then check the schematic to find the correct value. Looks like one side is soldered to gnd.
#8

"Compensating condenser" is correct. Also known as a trimmer capacitor.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#9

SO - - are the pictures supposed to be really huge (now)?

It's like a close-up. I think that I can see a mouse's nose-hair - from the 1960s - brown, I believe. Now where did the emojis go?

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/
#10

Depends on what size pic you upload.
#11

These are all taken with a macro lens ;)
#12

Have a old 3g flip phone that i take pics with for the internet not the best but do not have to resize pictures. Take Care David
#13
Question 

I've got this old Philco 95 that I am restoring!

Now that I have actually gotten around to it...there are a few more problems here than I had originally thought Icon_eek

Any idea what has been done to the rf transformers? Specifically, it's the first two that I am on now...
   

They have been attached to the top of the cans, instead of at the bottom (like the other two).

As well, the first appears to have had its secondary completely removed:
   

In that first pic you can see the bulk of the modifications that were done to it. My knowledge of old AM radios isn't the greatest...but from what I can see, it appears as if the first RF transformer has been turned into an inductor tied to one end of the first compensating condenser (along with the antenna connection) and ground. The cathode connection of the first RF tube has been disconnected.

Any idea what whoever worked on this last is trying to do?  Icon_confused
#14

Two threads merged into one by admin.

Per Phorum rules, only one thread per subject radio allowed at a time.

https://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=4586

Quote:II. Multiple threads on the same subject not allowed.

When you start a thread, please keep the discussion within the same thread.

Example: "Philco 90 broken"

After you've started that thread, please do not start another thread on "Philco 90 bad resistor" if it is the same Philco 90 being discussed in the original thread. Give others a chance to respond to your questions rather than asking them again in a new thread - please be patient.

These sort of threads will be immediately deleted, to keep clutter to a minimum.

Please cooperate with management in keeping one thread in the same place rather than scattering it around.
#15

My apologies!!

So the modifications done to this set seem to be around removing the antenna transformer. Everything is the same, except the removal of R1 and R2, the primary(?) of the first RF transformer, and an additional small cap between the first and second compensating condensers. I'll try to get a scematic up with the modifications!

I would really like to have this set in full working order! I think I'll have to rewind the primary on that transformer Icon_rolleyes

So...what are my options? Does anyone here know what the correct number of turns is? Is there any way I could figure it out, without prior knowledge?




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1930s Stromberg-Carlson Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
Hi Cap'n Clock, Unfortunately, I do not have this radio.  This is a shame because this should be a good performer.  2A5...MrFixr55 — 06:48 AM
American Bosch Model 802 auto radio
I think it would come under either American Bosch or United American Bosch. American Bosch made sets for the American We...Arran — 05:53 AM
trying to identify this wire type
Thanks to all for the feedback. As Arran said, it is probably an older replacement and yes it has a grid cap so I will ...georgetownjohn — 09:32 PM
trying to identify this wire type
It's possible that the red wire, actually a grid cap lead, is a very old replacement, I can't remember seeing a pre 1939...Arran — 09:18 PM
Gilfillan Brothers Car Radio?
Hi everyone,  Special thanks to Joe Rossi for tracking down this obscure radio and thanks to others who took up the hun...Antipodal — 08:15 PM
trying to identify this wire type
Here's one source for your wire of many. Take care and BE HEALTHY! Gary P.S. Can't get the right color you need? I ...GarySP — 06:40 PM
trying to identify this wire type
...and modern wire of the appropriate gauges and insulation V-rating (300V minimum, usually shown right on the wire) is ...morzh — 05:47 PM
1930s Stromberg-Carlson Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
I have a question about this radio, is there anyone that has access to this radio that has an intact unmolested speaker ...captainclock1988 — 04:28 PM
1930s Stromberg-Carlson Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
Well what makes me confuse all of those companies is that all three of those companies (Setchell-Carlson, Stromberg-Carl...captainclock1988 — 04:21 PM
trying to identify this wire type
The red wire is rubber covered wire. The others are cotton braid over rubber often in colors or a tracer, also strand...Chas — 02:43 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>