Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

89b code 123 veneer problems/solutions?
#1

I found this 89b code 123 at a thrift store.  The face and one side are in pretty good what looks like original condition, but the other side has 
water/sun damage?  It appears that  only the top 1/16" or so of veneer is affected.  The case if i put my hand under the "ripples" is flat. 

How should i deal with this?

The ripples are pretty high.  Some flex back down when pushed and some make a cracking sound.
Try an iron with a towel to reheat the glue?
Cut through  the center of the ripples and glue them back down?  or  Sand it all down? Patch.
I then would have a flat surface to get some more veneer to glue down.

Put me in the right direction here

Thanks

Bill


Attached Files Image(s)
           
#2

Wow that's kinda of a mess. I've had a few cabs that have had some wrinkles near the bottom maybe within the last 4" or so. Like yours could get them flatter but still where pretty noticeable after adding some finish to the job. Gloss really makes them stick out.

I think I would be inclined to remove the veneer and see how bad the underlying wood is. I don't think you'll be able to get what you have to flatten out like it was 80 yrs ago. The fibers in the wood have swollen from exposure to water and they aren't not going back to the original size. If the underlying wood is ok you could sand it a bit, clean out the groove in the front panel to fit the veneer in, and use a few wire nails to secure the back edge of the veneer after gluing of course.  You would also want to remove the base trim on both sides. It's held on with hide glue & wire nails. Removing this will give you access to the bottom 3/4" of the veneer on both sides.

This is just my take on it. I'm no expert just a hobbyist.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3853 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 3852 Guest(s)
Avatar

>