Variation with the 37-650
Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
This question is primarily for Ron, but if anyone else has info as well, feel free to chime in.
I noted in the Philco Gallery a different variation on the 37-650 console. On that one, there are a couple of horizontal inlays on both side of the dial, and on mine, which is pictured in a previous thread on the Phorum:
http://philcoradio.com/phorum/showthread.php?tid=2
...it has 2 thin vertical inlays about 4 inces either side of the dial. This is the version of the 37-650 I've seen elsewhere besides the one I have. Otherwise, the two appear to be identical in every other aspect.
I'm just wondering if there is documentation regarding the two versions of this console, and how common it was to have this or other variations on other Philco models.
Thanks in advance for anything you can provide.
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
Posts: 69
Threads: 14
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Woburn, MA
Hi Bill,
Just an observation, but your radio appears to match with the 37-2650X in the gallery  :
http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1937a.htm#bh
Paul
Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
You're right, Paul. That's pretty interesting. The variation could be indicated in the similar model numbers such as 37-650 and 37-2650.
Looking at the production figures, it does indicate totals include both models, so I guess that makes sense.
Paging Mr. Philco!  Your thoughts?
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Let me look into this and get back to you. Bill, as you know, I've been "out of the loop" for awhile, so do you have a picture of your 37-650 posted here or elsewhere?
EDIT: I just noticed the link in your post above, Bill. DOH!!! Your 37-650 is a very nice set.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
OOPS!!! I don't often make mistakes  but I see I have an incorrect photo in the Gallery. What is labeled a 37-650X is actually a 37-630X. I'll make the corrections later today.
Oh, and Bill, if you'd like to allow use of your 37-650X in the Gallery, I'd be honored...thanks.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
Actually, the honor would be all mine.
Do you need a photo that is reformatted, or is the one posted adequate? Let me know what you need.
Nonetheless, this was an interesting topic. I looked at the cabinet label and couldn't find anything that indicated "37-2650" anywhere, but the "37-650" was big and bold.
Goes to show we all learn something new all the time in the world of old radios. 
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
O.K., folks, Bill's 37-650X photo is now in the Philco Radio Gallery for the first half of the 1937 season (June 1936).
http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1937a.htm#at
Many thanks to Bill for allowing use of his photo. And my sincere apologies for the initial error in pictures. Dealing with the sheer number of Philco models produced, the occasional error is bound to creep in.  But at least in HTML format, changes/corrections can be easily made.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 236
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Minneapolis/St. Paul MN
Ron,
Always happy to help out any way I can.
Now, I'm assuming the other picture was of a 37-630, which was a terrific shot. Are you going to use that one in place of the catalog picture?
Bill
Sent from my Pentium II on the AT&T Dial Network
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Yup, I'll make that correction also...
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
|
Recent Posts
|
|
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
| Mike;
I've only run into a speaker with an open filed coil twice, and they were on newer speakers from the 1940s. One ...Arran — 12:48 AM |
|
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
| Arran
Yes, this is my plan for now and what do I got to lose, this is not even the speaker from this radio, but one o...morzh — 10:44 PM |
|
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
| Mike;
I would unwrap the field coil, and see if maybe there a break near one of the ends, like where the coil wire att...Arran — 10:23 PM |
|
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
|
| ...and this is what I did. I fed a little LT into the screwholes with a small brush, and a little on the rim next to the...morzh — 09:52 PM |
|
Philco 40-120C Restoration
|
| I combined the two 40-120C threads together as we like to keep the discussion of the same radio together. It helps with...klondike98 — 09:36 PM |
|
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
|
| Just checked were I buy tubes price is four dollars. So living in Florid we have a local source for tubes. David David — 09:14 PM |
|
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
|
| The higher voltage may be due to higher mains voltage. My mains run 120-125AC when the set was new mains would be 110-11...David — 09:09 PM |
|
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
|
| Thank you for your reply. I pulled a speaker from a Philco 41-221 and received the same result. I used a signal tracer t...bluecap — 08:45 PM |
|
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
|
| Have you tried a different speaker?
How did you trace the distortion?
How do you know it is weak? What is the reference?...morzh — 08:33 PM |
|
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
|
| Amen to that! Every time I think I’ve captured them all, I realize that there’s another error. My goal is to finish with...jrblasde — 07:00 PM |
|
Who's Online
|
| There are currently no members online. |
|
 
|
![[-]](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/collapse.png "[-]")
