Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

smoke escaping from resistors
#16

Arran

I thought you suggested the smoking occurs due to the field coil being disconnected.

If it is connected, anything can be the reason, and I thought of RF 78 tube shorts.
Part #19 short (if the field coil IS connected) would require also some short in the Det. oscillator tube, but even this will not reault in #7 smoking as it is serialized with some 50Kohms resistance and the drop on it (again, if #19 is at fault) would be so small (0.5% of the total voltage), it is far from causing anything like 200 Ohms resistor (also probably 1/2W) to smoke.

If #61/62 do smoke, this indeed may be (potentially) due to the field coil missing; #7 - unlikely.

I would say, if #7 smokes with the field coil removed, it will smoke with the coil in place too.
I would look for shorts in wiring - the schematic does not show any path that can do it.
#17

OK finally an update. Had a chace to power up with the field coil plugged in, no more smoke. It appears that this was causing the load on #7. However no sound or hum. Now that I can power up and leave the power on, I will check voltages and it looks like I have a tube or two that may be questionable. Now all I need is some time.
#18

(03-18-2012, 11:20 AM)morzh Wrote:  Arran

I thought you suggested the smoking occurs due to the field coil being disconnected.

If it is connected, anything can be the reason, and I thought of RF 78 tube shorts.
Part #19 short (if the field coil IS connected) would require also some short in the Det. oscillator tube, but even this will not reault in #7 smoking as it is serialized with some 50Kohms resistance and the drop on it (again, if #19 is at fault) would be so small (0.5% of the total voltage), it is far from causing anything like 200 Ohms resistor (also probably 1/2W) to smoke.

If #61/62 do smoke, this indeed may be (potentially) due to the field coil missing; #7 - unlikely.

I would say, if #7 smokes with the field coil removed, it will smoke with the coil in place too.
I would look for shorts in wiring - the schematic does not show any path that can do it.

Well then you explain it? You are shooting down one of my theories, which is little more then a guess anyhow, but you haven't come up with any other explaination that hasn't been though of, as to why part #7, the 200 ohm resistor, is burning up. I did also mention that there may be a wiring error or a stray blob of solder etc. that could cause it. Part number #19 is directly in the path of the B+ voltage along with part #21, part #22, and part #14, there is no other path for the B+ voltage to get to part #7 as part #7 is in the cathode circuit of the 78 and 6A7 tubes.
With no load on the B+ line in that branch of the B+ circuit the voltage will be high and behave like the resistors #21 and #22 weren't even there and possibly cause the dielectric of part #19 to break down and short out. Again short of a wiring error there is no other direct path to that 200 ohm resistor. Another possibility is that the field coil being missing, somehow caused the cathode current to increase, but that doesn't make much sense since the only way that could happen is if the plate and screen voltages were there and the grid bias voltages were not. But when it comes to antique radios, the age of the components and tampering by former service persons means they sometimes do whacky things that are not easy to explain.
Regards
Arran

#19

(03-19-2012, 12:29 AM)Arran Wrote:  
(03-18-2012, 11:20 AM)morzh Wrote:  Arran

I thought you suggested the smoking occurs due to the field coil being disconnected.

If it is connected, anything can be the reason, and I thought of RF 78 tube shorts.
Part #19 short (if the field coil IS connected) would require also some short in the Det. oscillator tube, but even this will not reault in #7 smoking as it is serialized with some 50Kohms resistance and the drop on it (again, if #19 is at fault) would be so small (0.5% of the total voltage), it is far from causing anything like 200 Ohms resistor (also probably 1/2W) to smoke.

If #61/62 do smoke, this indeed may be (potentially) due to the field coil missing; #7 - unlikely.

I would say, if #7 smokes with the field coil removed, it will smoke with the coil in place too.
I would look for shorts in wiring - the schematic does not show any path that can do it.

Well then you explain it? You are shooting down one of my theories, which is little more then a guess anyhow, but you haven't come up with any other explaination that hasn't been though of, as to why part #7, the 200 ohm resistor, is burning up. I did also mention that there may be a wiring error or a stray blob of solder etc. that could cause it. Part number #19 is directly in the path of the B+ voltage along with part #21, part #22, and part #14, there is no other path for the B+ voltage to get to part #7 as part #7 is in the cathode circuit of the 78 and 6A7 tubes.
With no load on the B+ line in that branch of the B+ circuit the voltage will be high and behave like the resistors #21 and #22 weren't even there and possibly cause the dielectric of part #19 to break down and short out. Again short of a wiring error there is no other direct path to that 200 ohm resistor. Another possibility is that the field coil being missing, somehow caused the cathode current to increase, but that doesn't make much sense since the only way that could happen is if the plate and screen voltages were there and the grid bias voltages were not. But when it comes to antique radios, the age of the components and tampering by former service persons means they sometimes do whacky things that are not easy to explain.
Regards
Arran

Arran,

I was saying something before (mentioning shorts in wiring) that completely agrees with your notion of wiring error: it is, like you said, either wiring (error/short due to old wiring) or solder blob.

But if you look at the sch, if the wiring is intact, you yourself can see that there's no way in heck the absence of the field coil can create the smoking of #7, unless there are pre-existing conditions (just mentioned by you and me). A tube short is possible also, but first there have to be other shorts, so a shorted tube can create this if the plate power is absent.

I mean no disrespect.

Mike.

#20

What about the antenna tranformer not being plugged into the chassis? Would that solve the mystery with #7 burning?
#21

(03-20-2012, 01:06 PM)raydog Wrote:  What about the antenna tranformer not being plugged into the chassis? Would that solve the mystery with #7 burning?

By the Antenna transformer do you mean #3? (it is easier if you refer by position numbers).
No, that won't burn anything.

1. Here's the thing: all the tubes seem to connect through what essentially is a piece of wire (coils) for the DC current to the Plate voltage. So, yes, make the bias right and your resistor will smoke.
For this one to smoke quickly you will need probably several watts (don't know the rating), with 1 Watt being dissipated at about 70mA of current.

The problem is, you've disconnected the field coil. Without this coil there is (if we assume everything is intact, no shorts etc) NO power whatsoever to burn anything near #7.
This is why you can do whatever with your grids' biases - it won't hurt.

2. Now, if it smokes, there are probably shorts.
3. The single DC path to the RF 78 tube with the Field Coil disconnected is #55 resistor (32Kohms). If we are to assume it is intact, and IS 32Kohms, there is not enough current to burn anything, as it is about 10-12mA tops without any loads.
If however it is burned in the "low-resistance" mode, there may be more.
But: you have to have the tube IN the socket and it has to be shorted itself.
With the tube pulled out this path does not exist either.

4. You need to take your meter, disconnect the parts that smoke and start measuring, seeing where the voltage comes from.

Does it still smoke without RF 78 tube in place? WHat are the plate voltages? etc etc.

The usual approach to smoking situation is: follow the current path. Find the power source.

And, of course - be careful and safe.




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
trying to identify this wire type
Greetings Phorum members, Hope you can help me identify this type of wire in the photo I have attached.  I am not sure ...georgetownjohn — 01:53 PM
Philco 60 Squealing
All correct shields must be in place, all tubes correct no subs of any kind. Check any soldered, riveted ground conne...Chas — 01:24 PM
Philco 60 Squealing
I have recapped and replaced out of tolerance resistors and so on. Radio plays nicely on fairly strong stations. The pro...dconant — 10:55 AM
Philco 46-420 Code 121 Reception issues
Welcome Eric, I agree with Bob and far as the two main electrolytic filter capacitors did you change them yourself or w...radiorich — 11:43 PM
Philco 46-420 Code 121 Reception issues
You mentioned the Philco manual and going through the check points...just to be sure we're on the same page here's the m...klondike98 — 08:13 PM
Philco 42-1008 conversion kit
Interesting. I haven't seen that before.klondike98 — 07:02 PM
12' Philco
Yes I had looked for it on the web as well some time back and could not find it. I was glad to see it turned up in Ron'...klondike98 — 06:59 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Now if you had a set with a tuning light then the bulb type is important to the circuit, some sets used those prior to t...Arran — 04:58 PM
Shadow Meter Bulb
Ok. Thanks for the correction.RossH — 03:09 PM
Model 28L
For 28 you will probably need to buy a Hammond 125CSE. Or any of the series of the power you need, with SE suffix. Then ...morzh — 02:09 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 6270 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 6269 Guest(s)
Avatar

>