Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

40-150 issues
#16

Nice bit of troubleshooting!!!
Terry
#17

To all:

Tested with a lightbulb apparatus I had to Rube Goldberg together. Tested the apparatus first, bulb lit without problems.

First run - visual; Connected primary ends in series with the bulb, no glow. Grounded the secondary, and got a low glow.

Second run - w/DMM:Repeated but with the DMM now in series with the bulb. As in the first step above, primary ends in series with bulb and DMM, returned to same voltage, no reading on the DMM. Grounded the secondary and measured about .05 amps.

Inductance is indeed a wonderful thing...

So it would appear that the transformer passes this test?

Richard

Richard
#18

By "grounded", what do you mean exactly?

If "shorted together", then, yes, seems like the xfmr passed the test.
#19

One primary side is already connected to chassis ground. I used an alligator clip to make a temporary connection between the other secondary wire which goes to the speaker and chassis ground.

So, if the transformer is indeed OK, where elsewhere might I look? I have been through the circuit fairly carefully.

Thanks,
Richard

Richard
#20

You mean "one secondary side is grounded". None of the primary suides are grounded.
#21

All in all, even if the old xfmr is good, probably does not hurt to buy an inexpensive xfmr and replace it temporarily to see if it works.

Use know good tubes, see if they are ok. If yes, then install the old xfmr and carefully bring it up and see if it works.

We don't know, the tube that was gone might've been just bad.

The higher than normal voltages question remains of course. Without the load it is hard to tell how much they should rise. I suspect they are OK, as it is hard to imagine that the power transformer, having a mind of its own, all of a sudden decided to step up the output a bit more. And the rectifier tube may only make it lower, if anything, unless shorted, in which case you'd see AC, not DC output.

Well, you'll need to do some tinkering.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>