Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Bad Output Transformer
#1

Well I hit a snag on my 42-1008 project:

the output transformer (#73 part no. 32-8133) primary is reading 4.7Kohms on one leg to the center tap and 180 ohms from the other leg to center tap. The secondary is .6 ohms.

Does anyone have any suggestions on what to do about a replacement or substitute?
#2

John Kendall at http://www.vintage-electronics.com/rjy.htm
has a 42-1008 chassis for parts. You would need to email him to see if he has the output transformer available. If not you could go the universal Hammond transformer route. Radio Daze sells these.
#3

Failed output transformers seem to be a common problem with early 40s Philcos, but the usual failure is an open primary not shorted turns. Have you disconnected anything tha may be connected in parallel to the primary? If it does turn out to be defective I would try to find a push pull output transformer from a parts set that is NOT an early 40s Philco or a new one, or an aftermarket NOS replacement. Harvesting one from another Philco chassis of the early 40s may be a wasted effort, you may end up with another dud that way.
Regards
Arran
#4

The schematic shows the primary should be 220 ohms from center tap to one leg and 200 ohms from center tap to the other leg. It also says the secondary should be .2 ohms.
#5

Does anyone know what I'm looking for in a replacement transformer? I have no idea what power rating, impedance, etc. that is needed for this application.
#6

32-8133 specs:

Primary impedance 17,000 ohms center-tapped; secondary 5 ohms; 6 watts; turns ratio 58:1.

A Hammond 125C would be a good replacement. It looks like you would want to connect your speaker voice coil across either output terminals 1 and 3, or terminals 2 and 4 (whichever one gives greatest volume).

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#7

Thanks for the info, Ron. I really appreciate it. Icon_smile




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2119 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2117 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>