Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Radiola 46, good or bad radio?
#1

I saw one of these for sale on CL with a group of radios and I have to ask if anyone here has ever experienced one of these consoles? It is the mate to the Radiola 66 and I love to have one, but have heard that they have a pot metal chassis. Is that true? If so, how bad would one of these be to repair?
Yeah I know, I am trying to avoid more big radios, but I am sucker for the Radiolas with the grill clothes like that.

No matter where you go, there you are.
#2

Hello, Jay: if it tries to steal your wallet, eat all your food, or make love to your wife, then it is probably a BAD radio.........Icon_wink
#3

Don' think there ever was a pot metal chassis. Could be wrong an it wouldent be the first time
#4

LOL! Yeah, that would make it a bad radio!
@codefox: Apparently it DOES have a pot metal chassis. The little tuner chassis is made from a block of cast pot metal. I guess GE had a few suppliers and depending on who cast it at what time the chassis is either solid as a rock, warped, or disintegrated. I did some research last night on the subject. This radio is part of a group of radios for sale in Parma, OH.

No matter where you go, there you are.
#5

I then stand corrected. I'd probably pass on these.
#6

I don't know much about a Radiola 46 but I own a Radiola 44 and they used a type of pot metal in the tuning chassis, but most don't disintegatrate so much as warp causing the plates to rub. The good news in the case of the Radiola 44 is that the stators are in seperate sections so you can move each section to cure the rubbing plates. It isn't an outstanding radio but not a bad one, it is only a TRF while other RCA sets were Superhets but TRFs can perform reasonably well onec everything is set up right.
One set I have heard of being a dog is a Radiola 33, they were a budget model with a steel cabinet, a true 1920s art deco steel cabinet, I have the matching speaker to a 33. If you can find one in good shape that's fine but the steel cabinet had pot metal corners which sometimes broke, and the steel panels had a faux woodgrain that is often worn off.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2123 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 2122 Guest(s)
Avatar

>