Posts: 193
Threads: 50
Joined: Oct 2011
City: York PA
I just got my schematics from Chuck for the early 18 model. None of changes that I see on my chassis are listed. So I'd like some opinions! (1) the 2/2/1 electrotyic on mine is a 3/3/2. It has a Philco part # and a penciled-on price of, I believe, 85 cents. This could just be a replacement, correct? And should I use those values to restuff it? (2) A change is listed for the 8 & 10 electrolytic cans as replaced with a single 8/10 can. I have a Solar 20/20/20 can. The third 20 is 25V and goes to chassis ground. What values should I restuff this can with?
Posts: 193
Threads: 50
Joined: Oct 2011
City: York PA
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
(1) Someone replaced your original 2/2/1 with a 3/3/2. You can use 3.3, 3.3 and 2.2 to replace it...or 2.2, 2.2 and 1 uF. It will not make a difference.  But do use 450V rated caps here.
(2) Yes, the original separate 8 uF and 10 uF caps were replaced with a single 8 uF/10 uF can. You should replace with a 10 uF, 450V cap in place of the original 8 uF.
Now, the original 10 uF cap was in the B- (bias) circuit. Here, you want to use a 10 uF, 50 volt cap. On this one, the positive is connected to ground, and the negative is connected to B-.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 193
Threads: 50
Joined: Oct 2011
City: York PA
Quote:Yes, the original separate 8 uF and 10 uF caps were replaced with a single 8 uF/10 uF can.
Except on mine, they put all three (8/10/10) in one can. Because the hole on the chassis for part#55, that had the 10mfd positive to chassis ground, is empty and has no mounting shadow. So then that 3 part can was replaced with the Solar 20/20/20. All makes sense, now. Is this "Welcome to the world of undocumented factory changes"?
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
DKinYORKpa Wrote:Except on mine, they put all three (8/10/10) in one can.
No, they didn't - not at the factory, anyway. There are - or, should I say, were - two aluminum electrolytic cans held on top of the chassis by a metal strap, bracket and screw. These are capacitors (53) and (54).
An under-chassis view will help:
[Image: http://i326.photobucket.com/albums/k420/...9c3ddd.jpg]
(53) was 8 uF, 400 WVDC (6706).
(54) was 8 uF, 450 WVDC (30-2025).
(55) was 10 uF, 50 WVDC (30-2003).
Notice also capacitor (40), mounted at the left side of the drawing? It was 1 uF, 1 uF and 2 uF, all 300 WVDC (30-2029).
DKinYORKpa Wrote:Because the hole on the chassis for part#55, that had the 10mfd positive to chassis ground, is empty and has no mounting shadow.
Refer to the drawing above. In early production of the 18, capacitor (55) is separate and mounted off to the right, under the power transformer.
Later in production of the 18 - November 15, 1933 to be exact - Philco combined capacitors (53) and (55) in one package, eliminating the separate (55). Your set has no sign of ever having a (55) mounted on the chassis because it was built on or after 11/15/1933.
Now, look at the drawing below and notice the change.
[Image: http://i326.photobucket.com/albums/k420/...9e05d8.jpg]
The new combination (53) and (55) is Part No. 30-2045, and contains a single 8 uF @ 450 WVDC and a single 10 uF, 50 WVDC.
DKinYORKpa Wrote:So then that 3 part can was replaced with the Solar 20/20/20.
No, Philco did not install a 20/20/20 Solar cap at the factory. They installed part no. 30-2029 (1/1/2 uF) as shown in the drawings above - part (40).
What some repairman did after the set left the factory cannot be explained by factory documentation. What I have given you are the facts on how Philco originally installed the electrolytics. You have to take this information, compare it to the current condition of your set, and repair accordingly.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 193
Threads: 50
Joined: Oct 2011
City: York PA
OK, thanks, I follow that. I knew that the Solar was not factory, though. Why is that 2nd layout not in my paperwork from Chuck? It would have cleared things up immediately.
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
DKinYORKpa Wrote:Why is that 2nd layout not in my paperwork from Chuck?
Because it did not exist until I created it in Paint Shop Pro, to try and help you out. 8)
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 193
Threads: 50
Joined: Oct 2011
City: York PA
Quote:Because it did not exist until I created it in Paint Shop Pro, to try and help you out
  You know I just went out to my shop and took a closer look and you are absolutely right! The piece of sheet metal on the top of the chassis that was folded up straight in the air for those cans is neatly sawed off! This was to make a little room for the Solar can to be attached and screwed to the chassis. How could I have ever doubted you  ?
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
DKinYORKpa Wrote:How could I have ever doubted you ?
Don't listen to those guys on the other forum who pretend that I, and this website, do not exist.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 2,353
Threads: 92
Joined: May 2010
City: Clayton, NC
The Doctor of Philcology strikes again! 
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
|
Recent Posts
|
|
Shadow Meter Bulb
|
| Phorum members, I am trying to find the bulb # for PHILCO Shadow Meter part number 45-2180 that is from a 37-640 chassis...georgetownjohn — 06:53 PM |
|
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
|
| 3D-printing...short of machining, of course.
Or molding.morzh — 05:20 PM |
|
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
|
| Thanks, Morzh.
That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM |
|
12' Philco
|
| If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel.
Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM |
|
12' Philco
|
| And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM |
|
Hickok AC51 tube tester
|
| I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer.
Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM |
|
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
|
| Arran
If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM |
|
12' Philco
|
| Rod,
Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently.
H...morzh — 12:54 PM |
|
Hickok AC51 tube tester
|
| Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM |
|
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
|
| Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM |
|
Who's Online
|
There are currently 5595 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 5594 Guest(s)
|
|
|
|
 
|
![[-]](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/collapse.png "[-]")
