Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Atwater-Kent 72
#1

Check one radio off my Bucket List! I just picked up the little nine tube console today in Canton, OH: the home of the AK consoles with sawn-off legs. This console is complete, the legs are intact, and it uses a model H chassis and I think a model N speaker if I recall right. Speaker weighs about as much as the chassis, but looks good and intact. Hopefully the speaker is good as I've had my share of headaches with the AK speakers over the years, usually with the later AK radios.

P.S. This came from the same guy who has the four Philco 20's and it was another "Never for sale" radio. I traded a few little items he wanted and managed to snag this radio and he is moving to a 'maybe' on one of the Philco 20's by the way he talked today.

   

No matter where you go, there you are.
#2

Congratulations! Icon_thumbup Icon_clap

I like the dials on those AK 70-series consoles, but from what I have read and heard, the power transformers in those are often bad, or go bad easily. I once had a 76 I believe, several years ago, with a bad transformer. I got rid of it later on, never did anything else with it.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Nice set! With an antenna connected to the "distant" terminal and the switch set to "distant" you will be surprised with how well this TRF set receives!
#4

Actually, this set claims to be a Superheterodyne on the tag and right under the dial. Maybe this might be the 'H2' version of this chassis? It has one antenna hook-up, but it does have an little knob marked, "Antenna Adjuster" right beside it.
Ron: I am keeping my fingers crossed that the transformer is ok in this one. AKs are too hard to come by around here anymore.

No matter where you go, there you are.
#5

You know, I have never had an AK with a bad power transformer, and I have at least 25 of them restored and working, models 20 through 447.

I think that it simply depends on whether a former owner turned it on to see if it worked, saw the nice lights and noticed the smoke too late.
This would apply to all brands of radios that old.
#6

Regarding the smoke - Excellent point.

The 70-series AK I previously owned was a TRF. I admit that AK is not my specialty. Icon_wink

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#7

I think a lot of it has to do with the year and the model, I always thought it was models like the 84 that were more prone to having smoked power transformers then the 70 series consoles. If you want to know a make of radio notorious for having transformers go up in a smoke show then the order of the big black dial would fit that roll much more so then Atwater Kent, the current rating on a brand Z power transformer is marginal at best.
Regards
Arran
#8

Well, I will keep my fingers crossed. I pulled up the print and the 72 is indeed a Superheterodyne and there were two chassis versions, H1 and H2. I will have to check the serial on mine to see which one it is. I was looking at a model 74 table that was right beside this radio and it looked the same, but I think the chassis in it was TRF. Odd, because to look at the two, you can't really tell the difference other than mine having 'Superheterodyne' proudly stamped on it. If all goes right, this looks like it should be a good performer.

No matter where you go, there you are.
#9

Well..... I WAS an AK guy. Interesting, the older AKs (1930 and before) are usually a good candidate for reforming the factory electrolytics. I have had very good results from these early sets. In fact, the model 42 and 70 I currently still have have been playing on their factory electrolytics for many years, by me.

HOWEVER, I would NOT do this with the 1931 and later models.

Like any set, if the filters go boink they usually take the power transformer and other formerly good components with them.

I will say that AK used quality components and workmanship in their sets. I suspect that this made it difficult to make an "affordable" set compared to other brands. Compare a four or five tube AK, like the 944 or 165, to other brand four and five tube sets and you will see what I mean.
#10

That's a nice set that I'm sure will be a good performer.




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Philco 16 is not intimidating at all. Despite being an 11-tuber. 37-116 is indeed intimidating. 16 has good space unde...morzh — 04:11 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Thanks for the responses Gary and Bob. I'm a little surprised that there's no back panel - although I know older Philco'...keithchip — 04:09 PM
48-482 rear panel help
Gary is correct, there was not a rear panel on the 48-482. I restored one of those and its a great sounding radio that ...klondike98 — 03:24 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
A little light positivity in our feed... To nostalgic retro music... With English subtitles My new video on the contin...RadioSvit — 02:14 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Ron and Mike I mentioned a 2 meg resistor not on the schematic. I stumbled on a changes note in Riders that mentioned th...dconant — 12:02 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Here you go: Your the code 125Radioroslyn — 11:12 AM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi Ron, Thanks for the input. I think I'm going to call it good enough. It does seem weird I can usually dial in othe...dconant — 08:01 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Welcome, the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM
462ron
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2126 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2124 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>