Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
A couple here as I work to restore the above radio.
1: The first audio tube installed is a 6Q7, listed should be a 6R7, the radio works so I assume this is an OK replacement?
2: The part in the pictures attached came with the radio, I'm thinking an antenna transformer for what they appear to have sold as an option on the radio? Not sure what the antenna option looked like.
Thanks for you help.
Jerry
[Image:
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn129...e001-7.jpg]
[Image:
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn129...002-11.jpg]
A friend in need is a pest! Bill Slee ca 1970.
Posts: 2,128
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2008
City: Merrick, Long Island, NY
Tube sub is OK in this application. No clue on the other item
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
Thanks Codefox, but you have to admit the pictures came out nice! I guess we have to hear from a "higher" authority on the pics. I believe it was part of the radio antenna system at some point in time. The advertising suggests an optional antenna. Perhaps part of it?
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest! Bill Slee ca 1970.
Posts: 299
Threads: 107
Joined: Mar 2011
City: Sheboygan Falls,Wisconsin
Hi jerry,
You may be right about it being part of an antenna. i have a 1938 Philco high efficiency aerial kit in the original box. There is a part that looks similiar but not the same. Must be a coil or transformer of some kind. Good luck with your 38-116, i have a 37-116 that I'm trying to work up the nerve to work on
Kevin
[Image:
http://i1160.photobucket.com/albums/q500...ab266c.jpg]
[Image:
http://i1160.photobucket.com/albums/q500...ba6616.jpg]
[Image:
http://i1160.photobucket.com/albums/q500...fe1026.jpg]
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
Thanks Silverstreak for the pictures. Nice little package you have there. Looks to be an outdoor type antenna of a long line type. If indeed the item shown in the above pictures is an antenna coupler, it seems it might have been made for some type of loop? I could be wrong, and often am. The wires color seem to matched with indications on the rear of the 38-116, leaving the two screw terminals for possibly a loop. Any comments from the rest of the gurus? Then again, this may not have been part of the radio..
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest! Bill Slee ca 1970.
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Jerry, I think your unit may be a balun for a competing (non-Philco) dipole antenna. There are no markings on the cylinder with the PHILCO name or any obvious Philco part numbers in the xx-xxxx format, correct?
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
Thanks Ron, you are correct in that there is no Philco identifying marks. Just the "222" stamped on the top and a patent number. Also the following "LIC. A.A.K."
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest! Bill Slee ca 1970.