Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

I just don't understand!!!
#1

Well I started working on that 38-17 I got a few months ago. It looked pretty good in the CL pic but when I got it home it really looked AWFUL. I think some previous owner took a can of brush on poly and thew it at the cabinet and then brushed out.
The front panel on this set is a photofinish job so that was going to be a problem. Can't strip it or I'll loose the photo. So I ended up hand sanding it to get the poly off. Shot it with some high gloss Mohawk clear. I was surprised that the photo was in excellent condition very nice looking and has striking grain pattern. Why would some moron do that to a nice set?? The rest of the cabinet is in good shape with a few dings here and there. Still have to do some more stripping of the rest of the cabinet but did the top with some sanding sealer and grain filler. Stripping those little nooks and crannies is a pita but in the end it should turnout to be a nice and somewhat rare set.
Terry
http://www.flickr.com/photos/53710524@N0...hotostream
ps. Will post a few pics of the progress when I get a chance
#2

My opinion is that today most people aren't really aware of how wood used to be finished, or even what photofinish is. I have read threads more than once where an unknowing owner of a radio was going to refinish it and sanded the photofinish right off before they realized what had happened.

If you think about it, poly has been around a while now and when it came out it was the "improved" wood finish that needed no where near the maintenance of lacquer. Plus it would not be affected by water the same way.

Gene
#3

Wow, you have your work cut out for you! Must have taken some mighty careful sanding to get rid of the poly on the photofinish. Keep posting progress pictures Terry. This one is going to be interesting.

Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#4

I was surprised at how durable the photofinish was in terms of sanding. I started with 600G but ended up with using 320G to sand off the poly. There was a couple of spots I had to touch up because I wore though the photo but all in all it's pretty tough ( the photofinish). Tnx for the encouragement I need all I can get these days.

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Today I finished inspecting all the parts. The result is not very pleasing. The first positive news: 1) The power tr...Vlad95 — 11:40 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, found muh culprit. After using socket test adapters and finding voltages all ok, swapping 6V6s, no avail, swapped ...TV MAN — 11:18 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
Well, maybe - maybe not  :lol: It's been an interesting project so far! Something so simple, yet so cranky. The 1st one ...TV MAN — 05:12 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteres in a while  https://www.radionostalgia.ca/lib/Images/battery/us/burgess1D.jpgi ...Vlad95 — 03:50 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Measure the voltages first, just in case.morzh — 02:19 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Haven't thought of Burgess batteries in a while Mr. Fixer. Boston Edison always used Burgess in their Bright Star yellow...Paul Philco322 — 02:17 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thanks Sam. I'll let you know. I can probably scare some up from the local radio club.klondike98 — 02:07 PM
Philco 89 Code 123 Osc Coil
Hello,  I thought I would post my findings on my bad oscillator tickler coil. There were 27 turns on the outer coil b...dconant — 12:38 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
Thanks Morzh. So it appears I did wire it incorrectly and I have to switch the wires between pins 2 and 4.bobclausen — 09:24 AM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
No, it's not a problem, just during certain condition it could show up. Yes, an internal tube short could do that too. ...morzh — 09:13 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 567 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 564 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>