What output transformer will work?
Posts: 1,475
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2012
City: Kansas city, MO.
After searching for months for an H-16 speaker for my Philco 144 console. I found an H-29 with the 660 field coil.Now I will need to purchase a single ended O/T . Would a hammond 125d work? This chassis uses the single 42 output tube. Right now I just want to get something so I can safely power up the unit. I recapped & rebuilt the bakelites months ago and put on shelf till now. Thanks for advice.
Posts: 16,495
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
What is the voice coil impedance? It looks like it is 1.1 Ohm.
The Push-pull transformer has finer grained impedance matching; unfortunately 125 SE series does not. The highest you will get at 1.1 Ohm voice coil is 2.5K Ohm primary impedance and 42 tube needs 7K Ohm.
Also Hammond SE is very expensive.
I used this with my Zenith
http://www.ebay.com/itm/OT8SE-Tube-Outpu...2321364cc4
It's half price.
However, this is not a match either.
What is exact voice coil impedance?
Posts: 1,475
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2012
City: Kansas city, MO.
Voice coil impedeance is 1.25 I figured I might have trouble finding exact match. I was hoping to get ideas on what would work for power up of unit for now, that won't damage anything. I plan to keep looking for the original speaker with correct tranny. Thanks morzh
Posts: 1,114
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2013
City: Irvington, NY
You can use just about any output transformer just to get it to work. It certainly won't do any damage to the set. About the only thing that will happen is that you might get lower output power or higher distortion because of the mismatch, but that's probably acceptable until you find the right transformer.
Posts: 16,495
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
The transformers like those won't damage anything, they simply will not correctly transfer the power.
Posts: 1,475
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2012
City: Kansas city, MO.
Thanks morzh & Mondial. I went ahead and ordered the one you used in your Zenith morzh. Just wanted to ask the experts first. I did figure what ever I got that wasn't exact match would sound bad. But at least I can test some of the work I did so far with out worrying about burning out the output tube or worse.
Posts: 16,495
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Did you see if the mechanically the transformer is a good fity? It is not terribly important though.
Posts: 1,475
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2012
City: Kansas city, MO.
I have not measured the distance btwn. the rivets yet but it looks close to the new one. I have read that you have to be very careful not to get any shavings in the voice coil if you drill them out.
Posts: 16,495
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Yeah....but where's the voice coil and where are those rivets. You have to really try. Though nothing's impossible
Posts: 1,475
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2012
City: Kansas city, MO.
The O/T is on the speaker frame and with it out in the open should'nt be too much trouble to drill out.
Posts: 4,875
Threads: 54
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
Generally speaking it's the primary to secondary ratio that's more important then the primary impedance, that's why those universal output type transformers have multiple taps on the secondary side but not the primary side. The #42 has the same plate impedance as a 6F6 and is fairly close to a 6V6/6BQ5, and close enough to a 6L6, so a salvaged transformer for any of these will work fairly well. What will not work well is an output transformer intended for a type #41, 6K6, or a 6AQ5, those are way off the beam. The only wild card is the weird voice coil impedance of some Philco speakers, most are either 4 or 8 Ohms impedance not 1.1 Ohms, that is if the 1.1 Ohms is an impedance and not a DC resistance.
Regards
Arran
Posts: 1,475
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2012
City: Kansas city, MO.
Thanks Arran, That 1.25 I quoted in earliar post I got off the philco speakers compatibility spread sheet that was on the philco phorum. It was under the voice coil impedance columb. There is also an out. trans. pri. DC ohm columb. that says 260 ohm. which is the original o/t .
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
|
Good morning, folks! I’ve finished the cabinet and the electrical restoration, and have detailed those in their respecti...jrblasde — 10:56 AM |
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
|
Arran,
Thanks for checking you manuals.
I appreciate that. Let me know what you find.
PhilPdouglaski — 08:46 AM |
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
|
I have some car radio service manuals, Riders I think (not to be confused with the big blue binders), so I may see if on...Arran — 01:20 AM |
Philco model 40-100
|
Greetings;
Here is an update, I found a listing on fleabay for a similar chassis to yours, and it has a photo of what...Arran — 12:58 AM |
Philco model 40-100
|
Greetings;
I think I may have found a clue as to what is missing, from a search I made, there is a rear view of the c...Arran — 12:12 AM |
Philco model 40-100
|
I recently acquired a Philco model 40-100 farm (battery) radio. The radio was in very good condition except the red on f...mhamby — 05:59 PM |
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
|
Hello, Richard
the radio is an AC-2687 Studebaker model. The Philco model is S -5323 and the chassis p/n is S-5523Pdouglaski — 11:52 AM |
48-482 rear panel help
|
The 48-482 is an AC only set as well, featuring a power transformer. While the transformer shouldn’t get “hot”, it is ye...jrblasde — 11:12 AM |
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
|
I gave a Chrysler/MoPar car radio from 1954, it was made by Philco, and it uses two chassis, one has the power supply an...Arran — 11:06 AM |
48-482 rear panel help
|
Hello keithchip. You could make a hardboard back for the set, but make sure you provide plenty of ventilation holes in ...GarySP — 11:04 AM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 2360 online users. [Complete List] » 2 Member(s) | 2358 Guest(s)
|
|
|

|