Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

3.0uf cap? on 116PX
#1

I am starting on my 116PX. I noticed a large cap 3.0uf; can I use a 2.2uf for that of should I get a 3.0? Could I use a 3.0 e-cap? I have attached the link to the schematic but the cap in question does not have a part number, it is next to the 30K resistor part#97 on the drawing.

http://www.philcoradio.com/tech/images/116px.jpg


Thanks
Skip
#2

Skip, I would think a 5mfd would work just dandy there and they are a common value.
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#3

I would use a non polarized capacitor, or a pair of, since the value is small. I think you could pair a 1 uf with that 2.2 uf in parallel to make it a 3.2 uf.
Regards
Arran
#4

Thanks guys. I figured the value was not too critical, just wanted to confirm.
#5

WHen I needed 3uF I pared 3.2uF and 1uF in parallel.

However I have just bought some I think 3.3uF which I intend to use in place of 3uF in the 37-116, which has both 2uF and 3uF values in it.
#6

3.2 and 1 in parallel will yield 4.2 mFd.

Caps in parallel are additive in nature.
#7

Sorry, meant 2.2uF. (I kinda guessed they add when in parallel) Icon_lol
3.2uF value is not even standard; 3.3uF is.
#8

I love this stuff. Why worry so much about getting an e-cap to the precise old value?
Going all the way to parallel caps? That is ugly! Just toss in a 5mfd and relax. It will work nice. Higher seldom will hurt where this is located.
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#9

Actually most of the places where those smaler values electrolyte caps are are not sensitive to higher value at all, the lower value being probably a budgetary consideration rather than electrical.

And the filtrer caps.....the one that probably should be observed is the very first one across the rectifier. The voltage will go up as you increase the value, and copupled with today's higher line voltage in the first place it will add that unnecessary extra we can do without. The one after the choke is less critical as it mostly affects the voltage when there is no load.
#10

That, and 'lytics are far from precise as far as tolerance is concerned. IIRC, the basic tolerances for 'lytics are something like -20/+100..
#11

Yes, that's true!

Just for grins, try testing your new caps on your cap checkers.
#12

Well, the tolerance of the Panasonic caps I use is +/- 20% at 120Hz at room temp and I did test them and it is right on the money. Cheaper kind general purpose can be that +20/-80%. Though when you test them new at room temp they are rarely grossly outside 10%.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 46-480 Cabinet Restoration
Nice work! Take care and BE HEALTHY! GaryGarySP — 11:29 AM
Philco 46-480 Cabinet Restoration
Thank you!jrblasde — 10:00 PM
Philco Model 95 High Boy
So today I get published as I update my collection in the Radio Museum web site. I tried to published pictures of my Phi...slford310 — 08:00 PM
Philco 84 antenna connection
Very simply connect al long piece of wire to that contact for your antenna.   A piece 10 to plus 50 feet is no issue dep...slford310 — 07:46 PM
Philco 46-480 Cabinet Restoration
I like it!Burchjburch — 05:57 PM
Philco 46-480 Cabinet Restoration
I knew when I asked the question here, that I just wasn’t satisfied with the darkness of the stain. Today I took some mi...jrblasde — 04:54 PM
Philco 84 antenna connection
I've used a single long wire up as high as possible and away obstacles. The gnd can be connected to a copper water pipe ...Radioroslyn — 03:34 PM
Philco 51-632
Found this today for $10 in the local resale shop. It’s a violation of good procedure but I put it on the variac. It cam...bridkarl — 03:25 PM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Rod Great job, looks good, no need to refinish to my taste. It is rare that you see the tenite grill in these in decent...morzh — 03:01 PM
My last cabinet for this year
Beautiful Job!!!! Looks awsomeslford310 — 03:01 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>