Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model 620 part 57 identification
#1

Newbie question. I see from the Chassis parts list that part 57 is listed as a ".1 MFD tubular condenser, It's not a tubular condenser it's a Bakelite
block with multiple connections. What is you experience on this, how many cap are there inside of it, and is the parts list identification incorrect? Thanks for the help.

God Bless,

Dave B
#2

Sometimes run into these things with a Philco. See what the part no. is on side of the bakelite block. Then see if it is listed on the philcorepairbench.com. Some of the lugs on the block may be only tie points for other things.

Richard
#3

In Service Bulletin 218, for the Model 620, capacitor #57, is a wax-paper tubular cap; 0.1uF, p/n 30-4122.

In the later production run chassis', see Service Bulletin 218A, that cap is now a bakelite block cap; 0.09uF, p/n 4989-SG. Essentially a 0.1 uF cap, in today's standard values.
#4

Took a closer look at it, can't see any numbers on the one side and the other side is not real accessible. It does not look like just a junction block in that the power cord ties into two of it's terminals. I also noted leads coming up from inside the block indicating that there are cap(s) inside it. Perhaps the tubular cap, part 57 is inside the block, I really don't know. I just finished rebuilding the # 20 bakelite block and PTL it came out OK. Perhaps someone else knows about this mysterious bakelite block listed as a tubular ca.? Thanks. Icon_rolleyes

God bless,


Dave
#5

Chuck, thank you, boy you get rate to the nitty gritty. I thought there was a cap inside that block, apparently there is only one cap inside it, correct? I bought a cap kit and replaced all the other caps but only have one left over, a 334 uf and can't figure out where it goes. I rebuilt the other two bakelite blocks and PTL they both worked out but this block, part 57, seems to be a really busy place with all sorts of connections to it. Should be some interesting getting that one out and rebuilt. Any suggestion please let me know. Thanks. Icon_biggrin

God bless,

Dave




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
PT-6 finished!!
I’ll get on doing that and see what happens. Just to keep this all in one thread - Anyone know what length/size is u...bridkarl — 10:01 AM
Zenith H725
Hello Ed, Well done on your part anyway that radio uses neon bulbs ? Sincerely richardradiorich — 09:43 AM
PT-6 finished!!
I agree with Ron. That’s how my 49-906 behaves. That’s why I’m curious if the bulb stays at full brightness if the recti...jrblasde — 07:54 AM
462ron
I don’t know exactly how dim your pilot gets but this is the typical of the response of many transformerless AA5s where ...462ron — 07:38 AM
Philco Battery-WWII vintage
Well Philco did start out in the lead acid battery manufacturing business, and I think that they were still doing so dur...Arran — 12:06 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
It is odd that they chose the autodyne mixer/oscillator in one version of this set, with the #15 tube, but chose to use ...Arran — 11:02 PM
Information on the Other Front Runners of the Era
It's not  philco but I use it quite often for Marconi radios which are Canadian. It is just another resource for u...Dan Walker — 10:25 PM
Zenith H725
Glad to hear the radio is back home. David :clap:David — 08:47 PM
Zenith H725
A great ending to the H 725 saga. I would feel all warm and fuzzy. PaulPaul Philco322 — 07:13 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Hello everyone!  I've been working on a Philco 38 farm radio with the code 121 version chassis. As you all may know thi...Stormlord5500 — 06:36 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2822 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2820 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>