Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

42-PT-91 Dial cord
#1

Last week I acquired a 42-PT-91 for $30. All caps and tubes are original.
When I took it apart I realized that the dial cord broke in two pieces and need to be re-strung.
I have spent close to 12 hours looking for diagrams and trying to re-string it on my own before I get into replacing caps and polishing a cabinet.

I looked at probably a dozen of places but can't find a string diagram for this radio Icon_sad

Perhaps someone has a diagram or has the very radio and can take pictures of how the cord is positioned.

Thanks in advance.
-G
#2

My list of string diagrams doesn't include the PT-91. Nor can I find a picture of it on the Philco Radio Gallery. Is it a portable, like the PT-88? I have a 41-81T, which looks similar to the PT-88, and has the knobs in the same place. If there is any similarity I'd be glad to open it up and take a look at the dial string.

If your PT-91 is very different from the 41-81T, then obviously my suggestion won't work.

Alternatively, you could ask Chuck Schwark if he has a Philco service package for this model. It will almost certainly include a string diagram. Chuck charges a small fee for these documents, but they are well worth it. http://www.philcorepairbench.com/schematics.htm

John Honeycutt
#3

Thank you for your reply. I shall try ordering a service package for this radio.

Though it is not a large radio, I do not believe it is portable. I think that if it was portable it would not have a power cord attach, though I am new to this and might very well be wrong. Icon_lol


Also seems that the knobs on mine are positioned differently from yours.
On an unrelated note 42-PT-91 looks very similar to 48-200, though my eyes might be failing me Icon_mrgreen
Thanks!

-G
#4

42-PT91:

http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1942a.htm#bm

Obviously, it isn't a portable radio although it is rather small.

The 46-200 is identical in appearance:

http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1946a.htm#d

and the 48-200 is similar, but the dial scale is different:

http://www.philcoradio.com/gallery/1948a.htm#d

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Thank you!.
I think I have figured how to re-string it successfullyIcon_biggrin. Let's see how long it lasts Icon_crazy




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>