Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

dumb question
#1

Hello all...
I have always wondered why the labels on some my radios say 110 V AC or DC.
Does that mean I can run it on DC?.... What would happen if instead of plugging it in to AC, I attached 110V DC to the plug? Would it work?
Just wondering...
BuzzIcon_crazy
#2

If it says DC, it probably is "hot chassis" set that has no power transformer and has rectifier directly from Mains.

This means that it can use both AC and DC.

This should never be attempted with AC transformer sets - 110VDC will burn the transformer.
#3

Hi:
These radios are AA'5. no transformers.
The reason i asked is i just assembled a battery eliminator from AES (antique electronic supply) I wanted to try it.......Icon_e_surprised
Can you explain what happens when dc goes through a rectifier etc on an AC system,, It seems puzzling to me, of course im always puzzled..Icon_crazy
Buzz
#4

Buzz,

A battery eliminator will not power an AA5, it does not have anywhere near enough current capability.

That being said, if you put 9 or 10 12 volt batteries in series, you've got it made.

Note that the radio will only work on DC with the plug in one way, but not the other. The reason for this is the action of the rectifier tube, which will only conduct in one direction when supplied with a DC source.

Also, the radio's performance on DC will be somewhat diminished, because you have the double whammy of the rectifier's forward voltage drop, combined with the fact that you do not gain the additional B+ voltage that you would using AC (110V DC minus the forward voltage drop is around 100V DC for B+, vs. 110V AC minus the forward voltage drop, but then mulitiplied by 1.414 (peak AC).
#5

thanks guys.. i tried it before you answerd brenda, and it powered up about 5 sec and...well something got hot.. was worth it anyway..
thanks guys,
buzz
#6

This dumb question.....(not dumb at all) brought to mind a recent trip to Boston. While walking on Clarendon St the building which housed the old Hard Rock Café and earlier a wonderful nightclub called Jason's has a very interesting feature on the side of the building. There is a Boston Edison panel which still says this building is served
by Edison DC service only. When the building was rewired to AC I do not know.
Even more interesting is Con Edison service in NYC where parts of Manhattan still had only DC service until the late 50's. I have advertising by Con Edison listing brands of TV's radios and appliances for DC use available at their stores with listings of other dealers where this stuff could be purchased. Tesla must have had a laugh as Thomas Edison's DC breathed its last breath although he may have been too busy tending to sick pigeons by that time in his life.
#7

Tesla died in '43 a broken and defeated (by the powers that be) man, and never got to see the end of DC service, unfortunately. Icon_sad
#8

There is a luxury hotel in Victoria B.C that had it's own power plant up at least until the 60s, it produced 110 VDC so the rooms never had any TV sets up until that time. It was owned by Canadian Pacific who also owned a railroad and it's own steamship line, the steamship terminal was just across the street.
Someone on the alternative forum mentioned working in a building that had DC outlets on the premises. I don't know if they still do but he mentioned testing out an AC/DC set just for laughs and it behaved pretty much as Brenda Ann summarized. There were some Philco models that were DC mains only, not battery, they were series string, with a large ballast, and did not have a rectifier tube.
I think that the fact an AA5 could run off of DC mains was more of a marketing ploy then a practical feature, even in the 1930s, as the market was fairly small. The real innovation was that they could build a cheap set mass market set with no power transformer.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Good morning, folks! I’ve finished the cabinet and the electrical restoration, and have detailed those in their respecti...jrblasde — 10:56 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Arran, Thanks for checking you manuals. I appreciate that. Let me know what you find. PhilPdouglaski — 08:46 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I have some car radio service manuals, Riders I think (not to be confused with the big blue binders), so I may see if on...Arran — 01:20 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; Here is an update, I found a listing on fleabay for a similar chassis to yours, and it has a photo of what...Arran — 12:58 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; I think I may have found a clue as to what is missing, from a search I made, there is a rear view of the c...Arran — 12:12 AM
Philco model 40-100
I recently acquired a Philco model 40-100 farm (battery) radio. The radio was in very good condition except the red on f...mhamby — 05:59 PM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hello, Richard the radio is an AC-2687 Studebaker model. The Philco model is S -5323 and the chassis p/n is S-5523Pdouglaski — 11:52 AM
48-482 rear panel help
The 48-482 is an AC only set as well, featuring a power transformer. While the transformer shouldn’t get “hot”, it is ye...jrblasde — 11:12 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I gave a Chrysler/MoPar car radio from 1954, it was made by Philco, and it uses two chassis, one has the power supply an...Arran — 11:06 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Hello keithchip. You could make a hardboard back for the set, but make sure you provide plenty of ventilation holes in ...GarySP — 11:04 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2350 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2348 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>