Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco Battery pack 41-8007
#1

Has anyone on the phorum ever taken one of these apart,or is a schematic of
the battery pack available?Am rebuilding a 38-38,and am using a AC pwr supply;would like to keep the 2 volt tubes,however the biasing of the audio stages has me in a puzzlement.The -9 vdc for the 1H4G driver tube is returned to gnd via a 900 ohm resistor in series with a 1 meg /100k resistor to the grid of the 1H4G-the -9vdc is applied to the junction of the 900 and 1 meg resistors.Now is this battery pack one continous battery that is tapped or are there separate "B" and "C" sections?
Tnx es 73 de Bill W4NJF
#2

Hi Bill

P9068 was a later (1946) replacement for the B and C battery used with Model 38-38. It was rated at 135 volts for the B supply, and 9 volts for the C supply.

There is a fellow who used to post here frequently, who is great at building power packs and making them look like authentic vintage batteries. Maybe he will see this and chime in.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Hi Ron,
If I'm reading the schematic right,the 900 ohm resistor in question is placed in parallel with -9vdc section(via the on/off switch) when the radio is in operation-quite a load on that battery!The AC pwr supply I'm building is actually on the radio chassis itself and is intended to eliminate all the batteries.I plan on using a voltage divider off the center tap of the B+ supply to chassis ground to develop the the negative bias voltages for the audio stages.What I need to know is this 900 ohm resistor necessary with this configuration?
73 de Bill
#4

The 9068 is a LARGE BC pack that consists of 9 volts C and 135 volts B--all tapped at various points. The B and C are separate but share one point--I believe it's Negative B and Positive C. Attached are pix of my repro and the original catalog photo.

Bill


[Image: http://users.mw.net/~bmorris/bcpack.jpg]
[Image: http://users.mw.net/~bmorris/finishedbcpack.jpg]
[Image: http://users.mw.net/~bmorris/bcpackinnards.jpg]
[Image: http://users.mw.net/~bmorris/farmpacks.jpg]
#5

Here's the socket hole layout and its associated voltages:

[Image: http://users.mw.net/~bmorris/bcpacksocket.jpg]




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
It is a 16B tombstone.morzh — 06:13 PM
Zenith H725
David - sorry, I reread your post and finally saw THD - now the % figures make sense. Thanks for explaining. The PSU...EdHolland — 06:06 PM
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
Hi Everyone, New member but have been reading this for awhile for tips! Vaccum tubes were before my time so bear with ...Ken D. — 06:03 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Thank you MrFixR55, I appreciate your comments very much. I do not detect much hum if any so I will be staying with the ...dconant — 05:15 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hi DConant Yes, you can replace chokes with resistors.  You do stand the risk of increased hum.  the solution is to inc...MrFixr55 — 04:23 PM
Zenith H725
1.7-3.9 %, a modified Sine wave inverter is around 25%. Most generators from big box stores run 10% at a 50% load. What ...David — 04:06 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
I am having a heck of a time doing the alignment on the AM band. I can't seem to dial in the 1500 KC oscillator. I can h...dconant — 03:35 PM
Zenith H725
David - I think I understand but what units are you discussing (Low of 1.7, high of 3.9)? Budget constraints for Ham ...EdHolland — 01:43 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
You're doing great. I wish I could be more involved, but my mind is right now preoccupied with the reason I am here in ...morzh — 12:21 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Hope you guys are still with me. I have moved on to the alignment. I completed the IF alignment which was pretty muc...dconant — 10:47 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>