Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco prototypes?
#1

I'd almost forgotten about this, but here is something for Chuck and Ron to chew on.

Possibly in the early eighties, I found a chassis that is glaringly Philco, but hand made. It appears at first to be a 116, or perhaps even a 16 chassis. It has only a single end 42 output stage, but the full-serving receiver that a 16 or 116 would be. It is a 5 band set. I put a 116 dial scale on it that I had laying around at the time I got the set. It seems to be the correct one. There had been no scale on it when I got it. The dial drive is not a 16 design, but the 1936 style.

Holes in the chassis are drilled; not punched as in a production build. It has two additional controls on the front of the chassis other than what the regular Philcos had. I haven't traced the schematic, but they appear to be possibly a second tone control or perhaps a sensitivity control and something else. The tube shields are not the regular square Philco style, but ordinary cylindrical generic types.

In addition to the above, I found ANOTHER similar Philco at AWA a few years ago, in a cabinet like a 16 shouldered tombstone, again with two extra controls on the panel. The dial bezel is hand-made, but looks possibly like the factory prototype shop could have done it. I haven't dug into it, mainly because I've forgotten about it. This one looks like anoher prototype, possibly in the same general era. It could be possibly about 1934, if they were prototyping the 116. The dial is the "shadow box" style, as on a 16, 1935 model. (I have one to compare it to)

Indeed, I can photograph the daylights out of the two sets, and I should do some research on them. I wonder if there is any other stuff out in the world that would tie into these two Philcos. I wonder if Ron or Chuck would have heard of anything like these sets.

Mystery of the week!
#2

Doug

The only time I had ever heard of any such sets was in a phone conversation you and I had some years ago, when you mentioned these to me. Thank you for jogging my memory, I had forgotten about them.

Photos would be great, not only for here, but for this new Philco book I have completed, but still unpublished (LONG story).

Those could be prototype 116 sets? But the single-ended 42 output doesn't fit in with their high-end model. Strange.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Great! Pictures...pictures.... Icon_biggrin

If they are Engr. Dept. prototypes, they have lived a charmed life to be intact this long and not trashed or re-used/dismantled.

The single-ended 42 stage does sound (no pun) strange.
#4

The single ended 42 is on the uncased chassis, and I will have to look at the one in the cabinet. I suspect that the reason for the simple single end output in a prototype would be that the set was for evaluation of performance and that the audio in the final model would be the "satandard" setup, using the three 42s. We know that Philco's driver and class AB triode output was a standard thing in those days. They didn't push the 42s as hard in the table sets (lower voltages) than in the consoles or the Lazy-X with the big U-2 speaker. Those tubes could blow a "S" speaker through the front of the cabinet, were the listener not cautious.

I took a look at the uncased chassis last night, and it's pretty full. I'd like to trace the schematic, and it will be a real job for that reason.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
New Philco Repair Bench
I am sure this is the archive, and not the Chuck's site.morzh — 09:50 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
It's not like we are good friends with that wire and can tell it from other ptetty identical looking wires. Why'n't you...morzh — 09:49 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I'm not sure why that wire wasn't covered in the video. I'm pretty sure the 6A8 won't work until that pin is grounded. Y...RodB — 09:47 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
You'll have to forgive me, I am not sure what you mean.  Can you explain what you are really saying.  If anyone does not...georgetownjohn — 08:05 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Those are details better left to the ones who know. Maybe you disconnected the wrong end of the wire.RodB — 06:22 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Maybe this is starting to make some sense in my hard head.  Is this why the wire in question was not in the great Ron Ra...georgetownjohn — 04:34 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
I was correct with the 6A8 pin connection's, 7 and 8 are connected to ground as well as the tube shield (the broken line...RodB — 02:41 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
What does the dotted line representing that surrounds the tube in the schematic?georgetownjohn — 02:17 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Hello John, I have been there either label got lost or was not labeled ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 02:15 PM
Made mistake & did not label connection
Sorry, it is a Philco 37-640.  Does that help?--Johngeorgetownjohn — 02:14 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>