Posts: 240
Threads: 27
Joined: Jun 2013
City: Boulder, Colorado
Hi All;
Now that the Philco 45 has been working for several days..
I am wondering, on alot of the Broadcast Band, I get mostly squeels especially in the upper part of the band, where Stations are so close to each other ?? I do get Both Weak and Strong stations..
I have done some adjustments on it, But my thinking is that the IF Transformers are too Broadly Coupled and so let more than one station thru, especially on the outside fringes of its coupling.. Am I anyway near correct in my Thinking or is it that I need to do a real Full Blown Alignment..
My thinking, is I need a Wobbulator or a Signal Generator that can swing 10 to 20 KC on either side of my set frequency and can see what actually my IF Transformers are doing..
Or would an Alignment do what I need ?? I think the Radio is receiving well and is more than able to pull in stations, so I am not sure what is the problem.. I have seen the article about building an IC wobbulator..
THANK YOU marty
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
Sounds more like a bad bypass capacitor or poor shielding.
Posts: 214
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2010
City: Kokomo, IN
Maybe a missing tube shield.
Posts: 7,294
Threads: 268
Joined: Dec 2009
City: Roslyn Pa
Agreed with previous posts. And if you've dittled with the IF trimmers that will do it too. Always use a generator to adjust the IF stages. You don't need wobbulator. You been reading some old dusty books again. Most of us would know it as a sweep generator. The sets you have been working on only have a single IF amp. You are unable to change the coupling between the coils in side the IF cans( physical spacing) so the bandwidth general is going to stay same. What you can change is the frequency that the IF amp operates. Both IF transformers must be tuned to the same frequency for best performance. The Philco 37-116 and several of the top of the line sets have a knob that moves the coils in the IF cans that change the actual selectivity. Also it has a pot to control the gain of the IF stages so the volume doesn't change as the change the selectivity. Gosh they think of everything!!!!
Terry
(This post was last modified: 09-15-2013, 11:42 PM by Radioroslyn.)
Posts: 240
Threads: 27
Joined: Jun 2013
City: Boulder, Colorado
Hi All;
Thank You all for Your responses..
Brenda Ann, and Vinzer, I have all of the Tube Shields in place.. I don't know If they are all Grounded.. But, they are all there..
How would I know If I have a Bad Bypass Cap, with out re-placing all of the Caps again ??
The One set of Caps that have Not been Replaced are C22, a pair of .09's in a Block, and the Caps in the Tone Control..
I have a Signal Generator, But not a low enough frequency Sweep Generator, the one Sweep Generator I have is for TV's, an Eico 369..
Radioroslyn, I know what a Sweep Generator is, I just don't have anything in the Radio Frequency Range.. And If needed be I could build the circuit using Ic's for almost nothing, hence Why I mentioned it..
THANK YOU Marty
Posts: 1,106
Threads: 88
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tacoma
State, Province, Country: Washington
That dual .09 cap could very well be your problem, since one half is the cathode bypass for your 1st IF amp, while the other half is the screen bypass for the 2nd IF. Replace those with .1's and you should be OK.
Posts: 240
Threads: 27
Joined: Jun 2013
City: Boulder, Colorado
Hi All;
THANK YOU Brenda Ann for you response and information..
Would I be better off with .1's or with two .047's on each side ??
THANK YOU Marty
Posts: 1,407
Threads: 72
Joined: Oct 2007
City: Linn Creek, MO
Do you have the grid wire of the 75 tube routed inside the tube shield?
Steve
M R Radios C M Tubes
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2013, 10:20 AM by Steve Davis.)
Posts: 1,407
Threads: 72
Joined: Oct 2007
City: Linn Creek, MO
Do you have the grid wire of the 75 tube routed in side the tube shield?
Steve
M R Radios C M Tubes
Posts: 240
Threads: 27
Joined: Jun 2013
City: Boulder, Colorado
Hi All;
Thank You Steve, Yes, I have..
It looks like I will be using the .047's as I have plenty of those.. I am heating up the Iron right now to put them in.. I will let Everyone know of the results..
THANK YOU Marty
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2013, 11:33 AM by marty.)
Posts: 240
Threads: 27
Joined: Jun 2013
City: Boulder, Colorado
Hi All;
I put in the twin .047's in place of the .09's and I took out the Tone control wire and wired in a .01, in its place..
I is alot better, the squeeling is gone except for a little below 700KC.. And I think that an alignment would help there..
I have tweeked the IF transformers by sound and put them closer to where they need to be, I had offset them a little to help get rid of the squeel.. But, since it is not there now, I could put them closer to where they need to be..
The Radio is playing more like it should be..
I can now do a real Alignment, since I think the Radio is ready for One..
THANK YOU to EveryOne Marty
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2013, 11:33 AM by marty.)
Posts: 240
Threads: 27
Joined: Jun 2013
City: Boulder, Colorado
Hi All;
Doing the Alignment took care of the rest of the squeels, Thank You to EveryOne.. It seems alot more sensitive now..
THANK YOU Marty
Posts: 240
Threads: 27
Joined: Jun 2013
City: Boulder, Colorado
Hi All;
I got some of my Tubes in, so I put in the 42, the 75, and the 6A7.. Its even better now..
THANK YOU Marty
(This post was last modified: 09-20-2013, 05:43 PM by marty.)
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
|
Recent Posts
|
|
The speaker table error?
|
|
G 10-1/2" 65, 76, 87, 95
Push-Pull 45's
2766
0.7
550
3200
H 10-1/2" 77, 96
Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM |
|
A Marconi model 86
|
| I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s.
This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM |
|
A Marconi model 86
|
| A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM |
|
A Marconi model 86
|
| >>What a behemoth!
A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM |
|
Philco 70 antenna lead
|
| I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM |
|
A Marconi model 86
|
| :e_biggrin: What a behemoth! I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example! Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM |
|
A Marconi model 86
|
| I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM |
|
Philco 70 antenna lead
|
| Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM |
|
Philco model 60
|
| I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM |
|
A Marconi model 86
|
| Dan
Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response.
morzh — 07:15 PM |
|
Who's Online
|
| There are currently no members online. |
|
 
|
![[-]](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/collapse.png "[-]")
