Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Hallicrafters S-72
#16

    Marty,

That's just it. There IS no wire, nor any electrical connection of any kind. Maybe it's supposed to feed back through the B+ line, but I don't think so, or it would get to places it's not supposed to. Not a very good schematic here, but you can see it's a simple Hartley oscillator. It is actually difficult to make these NOT work.
#17

Note that the top switch is power (B+) The bottom switch is for a noise blanker that isn't part of this particular version of the radio. This, and its accompanying resistor and capacitor do not exist.

Anyone know if there are any OTHER differences between the S-72 and the S-72r?
#18

This is the one thing I hate about communications sets, too many of the HAMs that owned them seemed to think that their license was equivalent to an engineering degree and made half baked mods. So they take a perfectly functional design and started screwing with things, drilling holes, adding switches, taking stuff out, second guessing the armies of engineers at the Hallicrafters/National/Hammerlund plants and rewiring them.
Regards
Arran
#19

It is strange that the BFO circuit no longer oscillates. Did you change any parts in the circuit?

I am surprised that they used a 22k grid leak resistor for a low transconductance battery tube like a 1U5, as it loads down the tuned circuit and there is not much gain to spare. You might try a 47k or 100k instead and see if it makes a difference.
#20

Hi All;
Brenda Ann, Sorry, I wasn't trying to mislead you, but, I was going by what you typed as a guide.. ""The only coupling is via stray inductance into the 2nd IF"" and that was Why I said that maybe a wire had been moved, maybe I was reading too much into Your Sentance..
THANK YOU Marty
#21

Hi All;
First I want to Thank Brenda Ann for posting the Schematic for her Oscillator..
I have been trying to copy down the Schematic for my Philco 024 Signal Generator and even though it is a very simple circuit, I keep on getting lost and making Wrong connections.. Yes, it arrived today, late this afternoon.. I have ordered the papers from Chuck..
Probably too late to be doing this.. And Lo and Behold, but Brenda's schematic is close enough to help me figure it out.. So, THANK YOU Brenda Ann..
THANK YOU Marty
#22

Don't usually pull on these old threads but was gifted a S-72 recently from one of are esteemed members from LINY. As Brenda mentioned the R version I can't find anything on it either. This is marked w/ both S-72 and S-72R There was a S-72L it has a LW band and less SW coverage. In good shape barring a broken leather handle and the corners are a bit tatty from wear. Was serviced back in '04 and still works. A cursarary testing tells me that it could use a going over, sensitivity is not all that great. More later.


Attached Files Image(s)
               

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#23

i am on my 7th resto on halllicrafters,,, i do agree they are very stable units.. the highest model i have resto'd was the S-53 which was free.

the BFO is prob some simple gimik cap where a wire is wrapped around a certain other wire for a minimum of 2 turns,, yet i have played around with that idea and have found that 4 turns wakes up the bfo sensitivity really good.

at the moment i am on the hunt for an SX-42,,, i think this would be the very best radio ever made for all things SW & FM,, but its gonna be a true representation of what we call boat anchors.
#24

https://www.antiqueradio.org/halli07.htm
Life is short I think I'd run the other away...

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Hi Morzh, May be a good idea to remove the cone to prevent damage. You may have to do so anyway to remove the pole ...MrFixr55 — 08:44 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I think that Danaher, the company that owns Beckman-Coulter (the company that I worked for 41 years) owns Fluke. They a...MrFixr55 — 08:35 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Rod I wish... :lol: I am not sure I'd buy the Fluke, had it not fell in my lap for free. $500 to $800...it's a lot...morzh — 08:09 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Mike, ...you get a commission?RodB — 07:52 PM
New member
Hi. I specialize in refurbishing Predictas, but I'm in Chicago. If you can get it to me, I'd be happy to go over it. ...Bob Andersen — 06:43 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
I have 3 G speaker, all with open Field coils. Today I pull one of the shelf and decided to try to remove the FC (spo...morzh — 06:07 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Thanks Mike. I will check them out.dconant — 05:52 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
There is no such thing as bad Fluke. This said, they are expensive. A Fluke is easily 10x the price of comparable CCC...morzh — 05:45 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Hello Mike, Yes, I have 3 Fluke meters one being my first Fluke 77 and other being Fluke 87. My third is Fluke clamp -...radiorich — 05:04 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I knew that Fluke was the Cadillac so with that in mind what Fluke would you recommend I get?dconant — 03:53 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3108 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 3106 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>