Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Beautiful and highly desirable INGRAHAM CABINET!
#1

really what drugs are they on restored ??
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Antique-1939-Eme...233069f423
#2

Half a Mae West with a crack in her ***. Chassis plays Ok but not a great playing set, Emersom had some sleepers but I think with the power cord on this one it could be electrifying.

Paul

Tubetalk1
#3

Yeah...that ballast tube looks like it just came from garbage.
But yeah...for whatever reason these Emersons are collectable.
Don't see why.

Here's from tuberadioland:
http://www.tuberadioland.com/EmersonAX-212_main.html
#4

That's no ballast tube, that's the antenna coil.
#5

Again, as Morzh/Mike knows Emersons are cheap radios in sometimes pretty cabinets. The cabinet on this set looks terrible, someone at some point slobbed lacquer or varnish all over the original flaking finish, then there is that damaged speaker grille. I really don't get the appeal of these, Emerson wasn't the only one to use fancy cabinets on small sets, yet they seem to grab all the glory just because of that tin plate on the back.
Regards
Arran
#6

Sometimes the plate is on the bottom.

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/
#7

I don't know how he can describe that as "restored".. it looks like he dunked it in a can of clear poly and called it done. I wonder how bad the insides are?

The artist formerly known as Puhpow! 8)
#8

From the looks of the antenna coil, I don't see how that radio can work. It looks like it has been struck by lightening.
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#9

I would take one of these, I bet it would play better, not an Ingraham.
http://www.radiomuseum.org/r/emerson_599_120075b.html

AM only but I bet a good player.

Paul

Tubetalk1
#10

Brenda,

You are right, at a closer look it is the antenna coil. Oh, my Gosh! This thing looks like it has been lifted from the ocean floor after 40 years. If it works, I'll be a monkey's uncle.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
AC/DC Transformer-less Sets
Model 40 does not have a rectifier, so it would be a DC only model. This however does not say anything about using...morzh — 08:01 PM
AC/DC Transformer-less Sets
I was wondering if anyone knows if these AC/DC transformer-less sets were actually used on 110v DC anywhere, and when. ...PeterN — 06:35 PM
Looking for place to donate unique Philco Philco J-1930 Prototype
Given the 1960s vintage, it is likely that the cartridge is ceramic, likely more stable. The changer looks like a Voice...MrFixr55 — 05:03 PM
Jackson 665 j2 schematic request
FIXED!daveone23 — 03:55 PM
Bakelite crack repair - what is best epoxy?
Thanks everyone. I appreciate you sharing your experience and looks like I'll work with the 24 hr two part clear epoxy....de371 — 10:25 PM
Jackson 665 j2 schematic request
Without a schematic its going to be hard tracing the wire wound spool resistors.daveone23 — 05:21 PM
Jackson 665 j2 schematic request
Looking for a schematic for the 665 j2 multimeter.daveone23 — 04:42 PM
Looking for place to donate unique Philco Philco J-1930 Prototype
>>I'll write to the Henry Ford. I heard, his secretary answers his mail, not he himself.morzh — 12:15 PM
Philco 48-200 alignment questions
Just checked the power cord and I did in fact wire it so the hot side (small prong) goes to the switch.transitony — 11:52 AM
Looking for place to donate unique Philco Philco J-1930 Prototype
Thanks for the suggestions.  I'll write to the Henry Ford.   That would certainly make sense since by the time this prod...jeibner — 11:49 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>