Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Another Philco Radio Question
#1

Guys I have to ask, I am able to purchase a Philco 37-650 console. I would love to hear everyones thoughts to weather it would be a radio to purchase or one to pass up on. The cabinet on the radio is in great shape. It is only missing one knob, the grill cloth is ok just a little stain on it. Let me know what you guys think, Thanks John
#2

They are pretty nice radios and perform very well. But, as with all 1937 Philcos, watch out for the infamous Unit Construction and the possibility of one or more coils being bad.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Ron as you stated why do the coils end up being bad on the 1937 Philcos? Were they made badly or something?
#4

I understand that Philco used a sealing wax that had a high sulphur content and over the years/decades, moisture incursion along with the sulphur compounds creates weak sulphuric acid and that eats up copper very nicely. The "Greenies" is the blue-green copper sulphate leftover.

This is not an indictment of Philco. These sets were not expected to last 60-70 yrs after they left the factory.

Chuck
#5

The other theory I heard of was that some used a strip of celluloid plastic, with a high nitric acid content, and that damaged the coils, at least in the RF coils in the model 90s.
Regards
Arran
#6

That's what I haqve always heard about the Philco coils - the nitric acid in the celluloid damages the coils. It's usually the primaries (outer windings) that suffer the damage, but in advanced cases the inner (secondary) windings can also get the "greenies" as well.

Sulphur in the wax makes sense also. And a combination of these plus moisture equals trouble at some point for the coils.

As Chuck said, these radios were not intended to last 3/4 of a century or more. That many have is a testament to how well products were once made. To say more would mean going political, so let's leave it at that.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
Good morning, folks! I’ve finished the cabinet and the electrical restoration, and have detailed those in their respecti...jrblasde — 10:56 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Arran, Thanks for checking you manuals. I appreciate that. Let me know what you find. PhilPdouglaski — 08:46 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I have some car radio service manuals, Riders I think (not to be confused with the big blue binders), so I may see if on...Arran — 01:20 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; Here is an update, I found a listing on fleabay for a similar chassis to yours, and it has a photo of what...Arran — 12:58 AM
Philco model 40-100
Greetings; I think I may have found a clue as to what is missing, from a search I made, there is a rear view of the c...Arran — 12:12 AM
Philco model 40-100
I recently acquired a Philco model 40-100 farm (battery) radio. The radio was in very good condition except the red on f...mhamby — 05:59 PM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hello, Richard the radio is an AC-2687 Studebaker model. The Philco model is S -5323 and the chassis p/n is S-5523Pdouglaski — 11:52 AM
48-482 rear panel help
The 48-482 is an AC only set as well, featuring a power transformer. While the transformer shouldn’t get “hot”, it is ye...jrblasde — 11:12 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I gave a Chrysler/MoPar car radio from 1954, it was made by Philco, and it uses two chassis, one has the power supply an...Arran — 11:06 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Hello keithchip. You could make a hardboard back for the set, but make sure you provide plenty of ventilation holes in ...GarySP — 11:04 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2362 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 2360 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>