Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco P-1002 AM/FM Receiver from 1966
#1

I had mentioned in another thread that I picked up a Philco AM/FM receiver recently.

It is a P1002, from the 1966 season.

Two quick photos from the eBay ad:

[Image: http://www.philcoradio.com/images/phorum...1002-1.jpg]

[Image: http://www.philcoradio.com/images/phorum...1002-2.jpg]

Pros:
Good looks (yes, the wood cabinet needs to be refinished), compact size, lightweight.

Cons:
Flea powered (the output transistors are just as tiny as the other transistors in the set), and the real kicker...designed for use with 32 ohm speakers.

So...my question to you is...what do you do when you have a pair of 8 ohm speakers and a receiver designed for 32 ohm speakers?

Never mind the low output power...had I known at the time that this receiver was intended for use with 32 ohm speakers, I probably would not have bought it.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#2

Three more pairs of 8-Ohm speakers?
#3

Not many good options for using normal speakers. Requiring 32 ohm speakers was how they could use tiny output transistors without exceeding their low current ratings.

You could connect a 24 ohm resistor in series with each speaker to protect the output stage from over current and dissipation, but unfortunately you will lose 75% of the audio power in the resistor. It certainly won't play very loud.

You also might try a step down transformer to match impedances, but finding something useable might be a problem.

Another possibility would be to use the Philco's outputs to drive an external audio amp capable of driving 8 ohm loads. In effect the receiver would become a tuner-preamp and the output would only be limited by the capability of the external amp. This would most likely give the best quality audio, overcoming the limitations of the flea power internal amplifier.
#4

Ron, if your speakers are two way (woofer and tweeter), pop them open and see how they are wired. If you have a 16 ohm tweeter and a 16 ohm woofer wired in parallel to get 8 ohms, just rewire them in series to give you 32 ohm.
#5

Well, I dunno...I might do something with this, or I might just shelve it and set my sights on a Fisher 175 or Sherwood S-7900 or S-8900 instead (after Christmas).

I used to own an S-8900. Boy, that was a great sounding receiver. When I bought it, its output transistors were blown. I replaced them, and the electrolytic capacitors in the power supply. It then worked great for several years, until the finals blew again, at which point I got rid of it. And I never played it really loud, either.

The S-8900 is FM only; the S-7900 is AM/FM but otherwise identical to the S-8900. 60 watts RMS per channel. I used to run my S-8900 through a pair of B-I-C Venturi tower speakers. I had an omnidirectional outdoor FM antenna on the side of the house where I lived back then, and could pick up FM signals up to 100+ miles away. I could easily hear several Nashville FM stations at my home (at the time) in western Kentucky. (I still have the antenna; I just need to put it back into service here.)

The speakers I have are Radio Shack speakers which were highly recommended by a fellow on the other forum. I have yet to try them out. I have a more modern Sony receiver that I have not used in a long time; it is sitting on a shelf collecting dust right now. I was thinking about selling the Sony since I never use it anymore. I find that I prefer the look of the older analog receivers.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#6

I've heard of blown power output transistors being a common problem with Sherwood amps, I'm not sure in what years and what models though but I guess the S-8900 you owned was one of them. I've never had much interest in audio amps with "sand" in them, all of the ones I have were either garbage picked or hand me downs from someone else.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 40-100
I recently acquired a Philco model 40-100 farm (battery) radio. The radio was in very good condition except the red on f...mhamby — 05:59 PM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hello, Richard the radio is an AC-2687 Studebaker model. The Philco model is S -5323 and the chassis p/n is S-5523Pdouglaski — 11:52 AM
48-482 rear panel help
The 48-482 is an AC only set as well, featuring a power transformer. While the transformer shouldn’t get “hot”, it is ye...jrblasde — 11:12 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
I gave a Chrysler/MoPar car radio from 1954, it was made by Philco, and it uses two chassis, one has the power supply an...Arran — 11:06 AM
48-482 rear panel help
Hello keithchip. You could make a hardboard back for the set, but make sure you provide plenty of ventilation holes in ...GarySP — 11:04 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Welcome to the Phorum, Phil! Lots of friendly help here to assist you along the way! Take care, - GaryGarySP — 10:55 AM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hi Pdouglasti, Phirst off, welcome to the Philco Phorum, a Phamily Phriendly place phull of phun pholks and all things ...MrFixr55 — 07:37 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
Hi Richard, It is starting to get nice on LI also.  However, this week is a total wipeout.  I am in a really good Ca...MrFixr55 — 06:48 AM
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
At long last, it is aligned! I’ve uploaded a couple of new videos to YouTube to demonstrate. YouTube picked up on Hall a...jrblasde — 10:08 PM
Studebaker/Philco AC-2687 car radio
Hello Phil, Welcome aboard what is the model number of that radio ? Sincerely Richardradiorich — 10:06 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1451 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 1449 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>