Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Early 2 tube trans
#1

I recently bought a homebrew 2 tube battery radio with all parts intact with 01a type sockets but the audio transformer is labeled 10 to 1 ratio, most others I have seen are closer to 3 to 1, will this trans work ok with 2 01a's? Thanks Todd
#2

In tube radios I have never seen a ratio as low as 3:1. Which would mean that even an 8 Ohm speaker would present as 72 Ohm impedance to the tube which is waaaaay low.

Your typical ratio at least 20-30.
Of course if your power voltage is very low and output currents high then it is possible but then we are talking transistor level voltages.
#3

What we have here is a failure to communicate...

The 1920s interstage transformers were marked "3 to 1" but what they meant was "1 to 3."

The 10:1 will work but these tend to have a peaky audio response, not much treble, and the primary inductance is low so they don't have any bass response either.
#4

Thanks for the info, I think I will try it out because 1-its original, 2-it tests good, and 3-it has the early 20's look compared to the generic 3 dial "trans/choke" look. Thanks again Todd
#5

Morzh, in the radios he's talking about, they didn't use 8 ohm speakers. Normal speaker impedence was around 1K-3K, think feeding a speaker directly off the plate of the output tube (basically those old horn speakers were just an earphone driver feeding into the horn). The sound was pretty atrocious by even 1930's standards, but the novelty of having a "loudspeaker" on a radio was still a selling point.
#6

The schematic included with this radio actually calls for phones rather than a horn but I think it should at least drive one even if at low volume. Todd




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3424 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 3422 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>