Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

opinions please RE: polarized ac cord
#1

I purchased this Philco 48-250: As a practice set. My first.

[Image: http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb212...250004.jpg]

And have a question regarding converting to a polarized ac cord. I have received differing opinions on whether or not to use a polarized power cord as a safety factor in this AC/DC chassis. Some say absolutely and some say keep it as originally designed. Also need to know if I use the polarized cord should I connect the + lead to the on/off pot or to the rectifier tube as the original non-polarized cord. Seen here:

[Image: http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb212...250015.jpg]

According to Phil's Old Radios I should follow the procedure found here:
http://www.antiqueradio.org/safety.htm

Any opinions?

Thanks for your help.

Mark

(copyrighted text deleted by site admin)
#2

Hi Mark

You should definitely follow the procedure on Phil Nelson's website (via the link you provided above) if you plan on using your radio. It will make it safer overall by making the HOT lead of the AC line switched instead of the neutral.

With the neutral switched and the HOT lead connected direct to the rectifier tube, the set is basically HOT all of the time. Using Phil's modification, the set is only HOT when the power switch is on.

Simplified explanation. I think you get my drift. Icon_smile

Edit: That is a very good set for practice. No rubber-covered wires - Philco used improved plastic insulation on the wires of their postwar models which has held up very well over the years. Not a lot of tubes, so it is not a complicated set. Best of luck with it...and be safe!

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Thanks,Ron. Another piece of advice that I have read is to add a 1 amp fast blow fuse on the + side of the power cord before the connection to the switch. Good idea?
Mark
#4

Personally, I would not worry about a fuse in that set. But if you do add one, a 1 amp slow-blow fuse is better than a fast blow fuse, in my opinion.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

Just my .02 here, but I think replacing all those old wax bypass caps & the electrolytics would be a great idea! Polarity of the AC line was never closely observed by mfgrs back in the day when these AC/DC sets were originally made. Orig AC cords had no large-spade on one side, polarity was determined by how the cord was actually plugged into the AC socket. Didnt make much difference back then if the end-user plugged the radio in "bass-ackwards"for proper polarity reasons?. Always be careful when touching or servicing a vintage AC/DC type chassis! Use a AC line "isolation transformer" while working on the chassis if possible! Using a 1amp fuse for safety on either side of the AC line is better than none at all, but not necessary in most cases except for added safety for the person restoring these vintage type chassis'. I always use the old theory of using the "one hand" method when not using a isolation trans when servicing the old "potentially-lethal"AC/DC type chassis! Just good practice, and keeps the restorer in the safe zone! I certainly wouldnt want any of my vintage restored Arvin, Kent, Silvertone, metal midget AC/DC sets near the bathtub, or kitchen sink, period! Those live vintage radio AC/DC chassis could be lethal as a old rattlesnake bite in certain situations indeed!! If you wire the polarity "correct" to todays recommended standard, then find out the AC plugs in your house was originally wired in reverse of electrical"code" ( many homes are!!),... then, your back to square-one unless you own a "AC polarity" checker and spend time to trace down every AC socket in your home back to the breaker box. The good thing about AC is it always works! The bad thing about modern day AC, is voltage runs to high, and your plugs in your house could be wired "bass-ackwards" in many rooms for overall correct "phasing" on the "larger spade"!! Reckon? Icon_wink
#6

Texasrocker, thanks, I have purchased the replacement wax caps and electrolytic caps. I do have an iso trnfmer and a back pocket. Since this is a starter/practice set I will be doing everything for the first time on this one . Your suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Mark




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 38-7 Speaker
I have let this one sit because of other duties. Now I am back, and I have a couple of questions. I hooked up a Hammond ...tludka — 05:34 PM
Philco 42-390, code 121 speaker
>>A closer examination of the very small print schematic indicates that the speaker is a PM type. This shows a ...morzh — 05:18 PM
Philco 60 Squealing
Litz is typically tinned by simply rubbing it with the soldering iron tip while immersed in solder (and a bit of rosin f...morzh — 05:14 PM
Philco 6K7
The suppressor grid (if by G3 you mean the S) is usually at the Cathode potential, which in this caes is GND. I am not ...morzh — 05:10 PM
Philco 16B Parts
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately the radio was removed before bidding was over so I didn't get a chance to bid.dconant — 04:10 PM
Philco 16B Parts
Hi Dan, Mike is correct, there's a lot of painted stuff on the chassis but it looks pretty good. The sm is all there,sp...Radioroslyn — 03:50 PM
1930s Stromberg-Carlson Tombstone Radio need help identifying model number
Hi Cap'n Clock, Unfortunately, I do not have this radio.  This is a shame because this should be a good performer.  2A...captainclock1988 — 03:43 PM
Philco 42-390, code 121 speaker
Using a 5W  1.5k  ceramic resistor in place of the field coil and using a 4 ohm PM speaker, I was able to bring the radi...Stevelog — 02:57 PM
Philco 60 Squealing
I have taken out the 2nd IF and found a problem or not. I believe the coils are litz wire. There is a very small strand ...dconant — 02:13 PM
Philco 6K7
I am restoring a Philco 37-60. The am reception is very good, but the shortwave is very weak. Run 6 Philco removes the g...bobbyd1200 — 01:35 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 4508 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 4507 Guest(s)
Avatar

>