Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

37-670 - bakelite block discrepancy
#1

Hi,

I am slowly doing a restoration on my 37-670 console and find that there's a discrepancy between what my radio has and what the schematic says. From what I understand, this is something Philco did a lot.

My schematic gives part #71, a .015 mfd dual bakelite block, a part number of 3903-LU. According to the Philco Service Bulletin No 289 the capacitors in that 3903-LU block are .01 and .006.

However, my actual radio has for part #71, a 3793-DU bakelite block that appears to have been installed by the factory. The No 289 service bulletin for that block calls for two .015 mfd capacitors.

I could be mistaken, but I think the capacitors in this bakelite block are somehow related to the tone control.

I've got my schematic and service information from Chuck Schwark and there's no mention of any change.

I guess my question is, should I go with what the schematic says and install some .01 and .006 capacitors or install what the part number on my actual bakelite block calls for, two .015 capacitors?

Thanks a lot for your help.

Tom
#2

If you have a way to check caps, you could always take a reading of the bakelite caps and see what they are so you can verify what you have.... assuming they are still good. Was the radio functioning when you started?
#3

Looks like the P/N was a misprint on the parts list.
Schematic also shows it as a dual .015.

Carl
Northern Panhandle, WV
#4

Raydog and Carl, Thanks a lot for the quick answers.

Raydog, I don't really have a way to check the capacitors in the block and no, this radio wasn't working when I got it. I still haven't plugged it in to try it. I probably could now as I've already replaced all the electrolytic and almost all of the paper and bakelite block capacitors.

Carl, I did notice the schematic shows two .015 capacitors for # 71 so I'm inclined to consider the bakelite block (part 3793-DU) that I've actually got in my radio as being correct. That bakelite block uses two .015 capacitors.

Thanks again,
Tom
#5

Couldn't be a show stopper either way if you can't find better information.
#6

I'd go with the two .015 caps. The chances of them messing up the printed parts list are a lot higher than them actually putting the wrong caps inside the bakelite block, or installing the wrong block at the factory.

The artist formerly known as Puhpow! 8)
#7

Agree, Follow schematic. In any case as suggested before certainly not harmful.
#8

PuhPow and Codefox1,

Thanks a lot for the advice. I plan on following your advice by installing two .015 caps in this block.

Tom
#9

Hi,

I am doing a followup on my radio to let you all know where I'm at.

I did replace the two capacitors in the bakelite block (part #71). The interesting thing is that the two capacitors I removed from this bakelite block have different numbers on them leading me to believe that this block had two different capacitors installed. However, I did go with the schematic information and installed two .015 capacitors in this block.

The good news is that I finally gathered up my courage, plugged in and powered up this radio. It works! I listened to the Dodger game for awhile. The tone control, which, I understand, uses the above mentioned bakelite block, seems to work very well.

I still have to replace the four capacitors in the RF deck and do one more bakelite block, but my radio is now working again for the first time in many years. I'm thrilled, to say the least.

Tom




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
So, Q1. Does anyone know where to get the spider. Q2. If there is no such place, what material is best? I doubt tin is...morzh — 09:43 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran The oxidation seems to go deep, a few layers. The break starts right there, but then it will occur on every la...morzh — 07:35 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, This is just a thought, the are on the coil where the verdigris (green oxidation is) I wonder if that is where ...Arran — 06:32 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I've made a one or two spiders by using some card stock, and a razor blade, it took more then one try but they ...Arran — 05:48 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I wondered about that. Wish there was some place local to get this stuff.dconant — 04:20 PM
Philco 89 indicator light.
Bending the lamp bracket (moving the lamp, that is) can possibly change the shape of the pointer a bit, but not its loca...morzh — 04:01 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Because the usable power rating of it then is (3,200/20,000)*25W= 4W. Maybe a tad more due to the mass, but not much. Yo...morzh — 03:59 PM
Philco 89 indicator light.
Thank you Dan, that was the trick. I kept trying to rebend the lamp bracket but that wasn't doing anything to help.Jim Dutridge — 02:18 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
20K 25 watt. I thought it was a 20 watt at first.dconant — 01:37 PM
My Philco 37-116 Restore
Nah, too much and not that important.morzh — 01:33 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5311 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 5308 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>