Posts: 122
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2013
City: Meridian, ID
Has someone got half a minute to assess the hum on this set before I put the chassis back into the cabinet hopefully for the last time.
The hum comes on as the set warms up and is only slightly increased with the volume control. It isn't especially noticeable when the audio is on. The only thing I've done to address the issue is to switch the 6A7, but with no change. Here's link to a 30-second video clip.
https://picasaweb.google.com/coldrb/Phil...directlink
My question is whether it's worthwhile to try to kill the hum, or should I leave well-enough alone?
Posts: 599
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2014
City: Edmonton AB CA
I had a listen to the video and sorry but I don't hear any hum.
Gregb
(This post was last modified: 04-07-2014, 07:30 PM by gregb.)
Posts: 736
Threads: 26
Joined: Jun 2013
City: Hayward, California
I didn't hear anything either... must be really low or something you can only hear if your right there.
Posts: 122
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2013
City: Meridian, ID
Thanks, guys. If you heard the audio, then I'm misinterpreting what I called "hum." Now that I know it's normal, I can declare victory and reinstall the chassis.
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
I heard the hum in the video. Did you replace the electrolytics, and are they installed correctly? Not all negatives go to chassis; some may go to B- instead. Check your schematic to be sure.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 15,444
Threads: 539
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson, NJ
Yes there is a very pronounced hum, I was using earphones.
Also it does not seem to depend on tuning, it is constant level across the scale.
What Ron said, plus
If the speaker is using a humbucker, is it wired correctly?
And, not sure that applies but just in case : have you seen if the hum depends on the antenna used, on teh position of teh radio relative to the wall, on the loads in your house turned on/off?
Also, do other radio exhibit the same hum or just this one does?
Posts: 395
Threads: 33
Joined: Jul 2013
City: Horsham, PA
I also heard the hum. I would definitely want to eliminate or at least lessen it. I would find it annoying.
Ron and Morzh's suggestions are probably your best bets.
Good luck,
Jon
Posts: 2,353
Threads: 92
Joined: May 2010
City: Clayton, NC
Agree about the electrolytics. Make sure that #s 58, 59, and the can that houses #s 51, 73, and 76 have been replaced.
Also check power resistor #64.
It is always a good idea to replace all paper and bakelite-block caps and check/replace resistors out of spec. Personally, I replace resistors greater than 10% out of spec.
Posts: 122
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2013
City: Meridian, ID
Prior to applying power, I replaced all electrolytics, paper caps (tubular and Bakelite blocks), and any questionable resistors; checked every coil including the speaker for continuity and appropriate resistance; and tested all tubes for transconductance and emissions.
I believe I have wired everything correctly, but (you may find this hard to believe) I have actually made mistakes in the past. I can read a schematic pretty well, but when I get befuddled I resort to sketches.
[Image: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-r8rVl...520645.JPG]
The BC resistor and condensers 58, 59 were particularly troubling because the condensers has been replaced with a couple of cardboard electrolytics under the chassis, so the physical wiring was changed from the original. I also wasn't sure which end of the resistor was +, -, B, or C. I rebuilt new cans for 58 & 59, and rebuilt the 3-condenser can.
This is a before/after comparison. All replacement components are reproductions.
[Image: https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-ihp5d...520645.jpg]
The power resistor has three terminals. On this picture, numbering the terminals from left to right as 1, 2, and 3; can you give me a designation for each terminal? I think I connected the middle one as C-. As for C58 and C59: I think the negatives are connected to the BC resistor and the positives to opposite ends of the field coil. The Philco schematic doesn't indicate (+) and (-) on the electrolytics.
I have to pull the chassis again, then start verifying my connections and check that I don't have any reversed polarities on the electrolytics.
Thanks for the help. It'll take me a few days to check out everything you've mentioned.
Posts: 2,353
Threads: 92
Joined: May 2010
City: Clayton, NC
Correct, - side of 58 and 59 go to the end (lead "3") of resistor 64, .09uFd cap 63, and to c.t. of the HV winding of 77. The - side of the can containing 51, 73, and 76 is ground.
Re check solder connection quality for all B+ circuitry, also re check any filter caps that go to ground. A poor solder joint will introduce hum in your set here.
You do nice chassis resto work!!! ![Icon_thumbup Icon_thumbup](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/smilies/icon_thumbup.gif)
Also like your diagramming. I do the same, but not as "lifelike" as your drawings are.
Posts: 122
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2013
City: Meridian, ID
Will check all of that. Thanks.
Posts: 122
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2013
City: Meridian, ID
I made a checklist for all of the previous suggestions. But first I removed a capacitor which I put in because I thought had been added in a later run--but it was not in Service Bulletin 234. The volume of the hum dropped at least 50 percent.
I went through each item on my checklist except for verifying the polarity of C58 and C59. I didn't want to open the rebuilt cans, so I disconnected those capacitors and temporarily wired in new ones of the same values, being certain that the polarity was correct. This made no change in the hum, so I assumed that the C58/59 cans had been wired correctly.
Then I wired in new capacitors which were twice the values of the original C58/59, and there was no discernable any hum at all.
I think it's ready to go back in the cabinet, but while it's still on the bench, I'd like to ask about one more issue which I bypassed when I was first checked chassis voltages several months ago. These were my readings with 124VAC line voltage.
[Image: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-D9Z_y...520645.JPG]
I asked about this briefly on another forum, didn't resolve the issue, but proceeded with the restoration because the radio seemed to be working well. I just rechecked the 85 plate, and it's still 44V. This shows the voltage peripheral to the plate, but it's beyond my understanding why the 267V drops to 44V instead of the expected 82V.
[Image: https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-qBwpK...520645.jpg]
So, is there any reason I shouldn't put higher-value caps in C58 and C59?
Should I be concerned with the low 85 plate voltage, or should I leave it alone?
Posts: 1,400
Threads: 70
Joined: Oct 2007
City: Linn Creek, MO
You don't want to go up too much on 59 or you will stress the rectifier. But go ahead and increase 58 some.
Have you replaced all the capacitors? Capacitors 50, 51, and 62 could cause a low voltage on the plat of the 85 tube. Also check the value of resisters 48 and 49.
Steve
M R Radios C M Tubes
Posts: 122
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2013
City: Meridian, ID
Thanks. I will experiment with various C58/C59 values to find the lowest combination that kills the hum. Also will recheck the caps and resistors you mention. All caps have been replaced except micas, and all resistors more than 10% out of spec were replaced. I've checked C50,51,62 and R48,49 numerous times, but I may try replacing them one at a time in case something is failing under load.
Posts: 2,353
Threads: 92
Joined: May 2010
City: Clayton, NC
It may be that at some point in the 645's history it had a component failure that "stressed" the power transformer. An increase of the filter capacitor values is a valid way to fix this.
Keep an eye on the power transformer. Make sure it is not getting to hot.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Rare zenith 6s137 restore
|
All of these restorations are two projects. The chassis and the cabinet. You're done with the chassis.
I would keep ...RodB — 01:29 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Thanks. The transformer tested per your numbers. Checked the wiring and it appears to be good. I’ll move on to checking ...bridkarl — 12:37 PM |
GE Model P-975F
|
There are 2 of these on ePay and several pics on Radiomuseum. Although the front looks like a very popular Hong Kong ra...MrFixr55 — 09:26 AM |
Rare zenith 6s137 restore
|
Hi Fred,
I get things to work, but what you, Russ, RadioSvit and many others on the Phorum do with cabinet and chassis...MrFixr55 — 09:02 AM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Hi Bridcarl
+1 on the others. Pin 6 of the 7C6 is the AVC Diode so it is appropriate that that pin 4 of the coil con...MrFixr55 — 07:30 AM |
462ron
|
Joseph, this is beyond awesome. A lot of thought and engineering went into this and you hit a home run! Now I must save ...462ron — 07:27 AM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
Outstanding work indeed. I wish I could come up with solutions like this.slford310 — 11:16 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
The abilities of our 'Phorum Pholks" never ceases to amaze me! Fantastic fabrication, Joseph! I'm waiting now for...GarySP — 08:27 PM |
PT-6 antenna connections
|
Thanks. I never realized that was a notch noted in the schematic as described. I’ll recheck my wiring.bridkarl — 08:13 PM |
Cannot Adjust an IF Transformer’s cores
|
Thank you! I was quite new to the Phorum when I started this post, so I feel like it might be advantageous to publish a ...jrblasde — 08:07 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 5024 online users. [Complete List] » 1 Member(s) | 5023 Guest(s)
|
|
|
![>](https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/bootbb/asb/right_arrow.png)
|