Posts: 16,496
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
well, I got this Halson chassis from Kirk Saturday. Yesterday, Monday it sang.
Pull the local station pretty well.
Did not do much - Kirk recaped it, so I simply checked the coils etc, checked the electrolytics (to the possible exent, not gonna open the can again).
Kirk did good recapping, I only replaced the line filter cap with Y-cap.
Radio sang with shield off. With shield on it played quietly, which is no wonder as the antenna wire was not there.
The volume pot is a bit scratchy...the pot is not easily disassembled. And it is a repacement pot.
There s one weak tube, 57.
The lineup is 57-58-47 and 80 rectifier (AC set).
I found Halson 515 which is, though having some other tubes, is very similar and so I used it as a reference for power and output hookup which are very much same.
Now, eventually when it pulled in station, I started looking for alignment....well, guess what. It got no pods.
It is, as it sees, a TRF.
57 and 58 first implied there might be a det-osc and so it would be a superhet, but no - it is a TRF and with no pods at that.
I can see bent outer leaves on the tuning cap, I guess this is the alignment.
Well, I am not going to disturb it.
Done.
Kirk, you will need a good antenna with it, it is not an overly senitive set.
And if possible you could try a good 57 tube.
Posts: 1,114
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2013
City: Irvington, NY
Morzh, are the tubes in the right sockets? Lineup of 57, 58, 47, 80 implies the wrong order.
If its a TRF, 58 should be the RF tube and 57 the detector.
Posts: 16,496
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Yes they are. I did not watch the order when I wrote, but the tubes names are on the sockets - hard to miss.
But you are right , I think 58 is before 57.
In superhets it could be otherwise.
57 is DO, then 58 is IF. (american Bosch 305)
Posts: 4,106
Threads: 310
Joined: Nov 2013
City: Kings Park NY
Very interesting, don't know what it means yet but it works!
Dumb question... Where does the antenna connect?
I have always had one attached so I never followed the wire.
I have another 57 in a box so I hope it is good.
Someone offered a Eico 666 but disappeared
Great job Mike! Better be
Kirk
Times I have been electrocuted in 2021
As of 1/01/2021
AC: 4 DC: 1
Last year: 6
Posts: 16,496
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Kirk
There was no antenna wire in there at all.
In those TRF types it usually attached to the point where the volume pot meets the top part of the antenna coil.
This is where I put it. I soldered a wire and put it through that hole in the chassis, that obviously was used for that.
http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel...013881.pdf
(at the very last sch, 2x47 tube output one, at the p13, look at the vol. pot's #1 wiper and #2 coil).
http://www.nostalgiaair.org/PagesByModel...008947.pdf
(look at the item 7 and coil 32)
Posts: 16,496
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Remember those two wires Kirk got zapped with?
It just dawned upon me: I think, someone was trying to make a tone control switch.
Here's the rational: both wires came from the primary of the output transformer.
I also realized the usual capacitor placed across it in Halson design is missing (of course I cannot prove it was there in the first place, but then identical Halson output solutions all have about 6nF cap across the primary).
And, although we are accustomed to see the tone control cap swutches from the anode to ground, it does not really make any difference if the switch is in between the anode and the B+, as for the AC B+ and GND are more or less the same. Which is where the primary is connected.
So maybe that what it was, that zapped Kirk.
PS. Maybe I should put a cap in parallel - it does sound a bit high-pitch to me.
Posts: 1,562
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2008
City: Sedona, AZ/Placentia/CA
Nice to see you Mike and Kirk working together with each you own talents. Nice "marriage".
I have friend in New Mexico that does great cabinet work and now has my Fada, I have helped him on some chassis but he is now working those on his own.
Jerry
A friend in need is a pest! Bill Slee ca 1970.
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Philco Model 249 made in England
|
Thanks for the information MrFixr55. It's tube amplification and not solid state.
TOMfklown — 11:27 AM |
Philco Model 249 made in England
|
Well, I’ll be! I learned something.jrblasde — 11:03 AM |
Philco Model 249 made in England
|
Yes, Garrard was well-regarded for its standalones.morzh — 10:48 AM |
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
|
Quite the interesting stories, sir! Somewhat reminds me of my first job out of school (not that I worked in a similar fi...jrblasde — 09:33 AM |
Philco model 40-100
|
Arran, I restored 2 Canadian battery-crank telephones for a friend a while ago, a Northern Electric (Canadian version of...MrFixr55 — 08:04 AM |
Road Trip for a Philco 46-480
|
Beautiful work, a 79 year old radio brought back to life. The first FM radios for me, a little iffy, had some I just cou...Jimradio — 08:01 AM |
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
|
I was a field engineer for a biomedical company for many years. Many was the time that I was driving home from NYC in t...MrFixr55 — 06:40 AM |
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
|
Don't laugh folks, I have not been above taking a chassis into the bathtub (when Ms. Fixr was out of the house), taping ...MrFixr55 — 06:02 AM |
Philco model 40-100
|
Marion;
By "newer style" carbon resistors do you mean the molded type with coloured bands rather then the BE...Arran — 01:00 AM |
Philco 46-480 Electronic Restoration
|
hello jrblasde ,
your radio sounds great well done !!
I bought like 20 years ago a Philco 610b that someone had painte...radiorich — 11:50 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently no members online. |
|

|