Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 38-690 with 37-690 trimmers??
#1

I almost have my 38-690 up and running. It had previously been aligned nicely, but I managed to get it a little off when I sprayed deoxit into the bandswitch contacts and unfortunately some of it found its way into the trimmers. I just noticed though, that this chassis has the full complement of trimmers and padders that you'd find in a 37-690 and they're located exactly where they'd be on a 37-690 chassis! There are no trimmers or adjustments where they are indicated to be on the 38-690 schematic. The chassis is clearly stamped as a 38-690 Code 121 and all the other components are where they should be. It's definitely not a 37-690 chassis. I'm not complaining since there are more adjustments on the 37-690 compared to the 38-690, but has anyone ever heard of such a thing??

Bob
#2

Early 38-690's had the same trimmer setup as 37-690's. The later versions did not. I would guess some trimmers were left off the later versions to cut cost. I could be wrong but IMO the early version should be a better radio.

Bill

It's not what you don't know that hurts you it's what you know that's not so.
#3

Even on the smaller 37/38 series sets, I've noticed some have the trimmers called for, others chassis do not. They lack some of the SW trimmers.

-Brian
If you collect or are interested in antique telephones, please visit Classic Rotary Phones
http://www.classicrotaryphones.com/forum/index.php




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I was just reminded of something else, I'm not sure why but many Rogers built sets do seem to have open primari...Arran — 04:40 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1001 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 998 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>