Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2014
City: Lubbock, TX
Rebuilding a Philco model 80, I used all the advice from Ron Ramirez. I had already rebuilt one of these, so it was easy to remove the second IF transformer to replace the factory 4 megohm with a 2 megohm. Imagine my surprise when I found no 50 mmf in parallel with the resistor which had changed to 6.6 megs. It was easy to put a 50 mmf from my stock but I was amazed that such a radio with a missing part came out of the Philco factory. It must not have been very sensitive. I could tell that no one had removed that coil previously. Interesting mystery.
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Later production 80 sets added a turn or two of wire around the IF transformer in place of the 50 pF cap; this loop is open-ended (only one end of the wire is connected).
See: http://www.philcoradio.com/tech/images/80acan.jpg
The 81 and 84 used the same type of IF transformer, also without the 50 pF cap.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 16,483
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Interesting.
Without this cap the Grid Leak detector should simply not work.
The radio could use some parasitics and still detect, but not via grid leak.
Unless they had some non-obvious cap there.
Posts: 16,483
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Is that phantom winding shown in the sch the cap replacement?
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Yes.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2014
City: Lubbock, TX
Thanks to all for the response. I knew that the model 84 used the few turns of wire instead of a capacitor. The 84 schematic shows that. There was no such wire in my model 80 IF transformer. Morzh is right the radio did not work well at all without the capacitor. It is much more sensitive now with the grid leak capacitor. I am still amazed that the radio made it past Philco inspection.
Posts: 28
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2013
City: Tucson, AZ
More surprising is that it has SURVIVED! You would think that by this time it would have been trashed! Glad it wasn't, and that it fell into the hands of someone who could recognize the 'Factory Error'.
Posts: 16,483
Threads: 573
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Indeed. Especially the 80, the "teaser" "under-radio"
Posts: 109
Threads: 18
Joined: Mar 2015
City: Ann Arbor, Michigan
I am starting some work on a Philco 80. In a 2014 post, this gentleman mentions:
"Rebuilding a Philco model 80, I used all the advice from Ron Ramirez. I had already rebuilt one of these, so it was easy to remove the second IF transformer to replace the factory 4 megohm with a 2 megohm. Imagine my surprise when I found no 50 mmf in parallel with the resistor which had changed to 6.6 megs. It was easy to put a 50 mmf from my stock but I was amazed that such a radio with a missing part came out of the Philco factory. It must not have been very sensitive. I could tell that no one had removed that coil previously. Interesting mystery."
Is there a tech tip or information on this 4 meg to 2 meg replacement? Or the 50mm capacitor replacement? Should I expect to need to make a mod like that?
Thanks,
Mark K8KZ
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
I wrote this up several years ago and gave it to Chuck to put on his page:
http://www.philcorepairbench.com/tips/svctip44.htm
Only early production 80 sets have the 50 pF cap. Later, Philco changed the IF transformer so that it has a capacity winding instead of the 50 pF cap. If you follow the link in this post and look at the partial schematic there, notice the little curl just above and to the left of the 4 meg resistor (16) - that is the capacity winding which replaced the 50 pF cap.
Yes, your 80 will definitely work better by replacing the 4 meg resistor with a 2 meg resistor.
More 80 mods:
http://www.philcorepairbench.com/tips/svctip43.htm
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Posts: 109
Threads: 18
Joined: Mar 2015
City: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Hey Ron,
Question about the "gimmick" capacitor.
I finished work on a Model 19 cathedral a little while back. I had rewound the tickler coil a number of times trying to get even minimal performance out of that 36 oscillator. My last and most recent rewind seemed to work the best, though that is to say, barely at all. I had done the coil baking and from what I could tell, I followed all the advice available.
However, when I soldered a 2 foot piece of hookup with to the cathode of the 36 tube and just let it poke out the back, the radio comes to life and works beautifully across the entire BC band. I tried various mica capacitors to replace the capacitance I supposedly introduced by the wire (gimmick capacitor?), but no luck.
My next step would have been to do the 6A7 mod, and I still may do that. However, I was suffering from "Model 19-fatigue", so I left the radio as-is for now.
Why have you never recommended the 36 cathode-gimmick capacitor for the Model 19 like you did for the 80 and 84 models?
BTW...I really appreciate all your great advice as well as that of so many other members on Philco Phorum.
Mark K8KZ
Posts: 13,776
Threads: 580
Joined: Sep 2005
City: Ferdinand
State, Province, Country: Indiana
Different radio, different design. Apples and oranges.
Model 80 is a regenerative radio; Models 19 and 89 are not.
Model 80 needs all the help it can get just to pick up signals as it was designed as a "price leader" just to get people into the stores where it was the salesman's job to try to sell the customer a more expensive Philco. The ploy backfired with the 80, and nearly 200,000 were sold.
Models 19 and 89, when properly operating, do not need any help to pick up signals as they are much better radios (not regenerative).
Model 80 has no RF amplifier stage; Models 19 and 89 do.
Your 19 should not require any "gimmick" capacitor. That it needs this wire to operate indicates that you 19 still has problems.
Please continue discussion of your 19 in your thread on your model 19 to avoid confusion. Thanks.
--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
|
Recent Posts
|
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
|
Welcome,
the radio looks intimating 11 tubes, wish you well.Jimradio — 07:49 AM |
462ron
|
Hi Dan, it’s been 10 years since I restored the electronics on my 37-116 so I’m going on some foggy memories. I remember...462ron — 07:37 AM |
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
|
Yes the 16B as morzh pointed out. Specifically its the January 1935 model version of the 16B. There are a couple earli...klondike98 — 11:51 PM |
48-482 rear panel help
|
Welcome to the Phorum, keithchip! How far you take a radio on cabinet restoration is a matter of personal preference. ...GarySP — 11:28 PM |
48-482 rear panel help
|
I've recently finished the internal restoration of a locally purchased Philco 48-482. The cabinet is in ok shape except ...keithchip — 10:28 PM |
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
|
Welcome to the Phorum, Ken! Lots of help here for all of your restoration questions. Take care and BE HEALTHY! - Gar...GarySP — 07:59 PM |
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
|
Thank you.
I went to your online library and found 2 schematics.
I will download and compare to components!Ken D. — 06:31 PM |
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
|
It is a 16B tombstone.morzh — 06:13 PM |
Zenith H725
|
David - sorry, I reread your post and finally saw THD - now the % figures make sense. Thanks for explaining.
The PSU...EdHolland — 06:06 PM |
Need Help to ID this radio 11 tube Philco
|
Hi Everyone,
New member but have been reading this for awhile for tips!
Vaccum tubes were before my time so bear with ...Ken D. — 06:03 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 311 online users. [Complete List] » 2 Member(s) | 309 Guest(s)
|
|
|

|