Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Removing old labels
#1

Got a repro label for my Philco 71 to replace the original that had mostly flaked off.  Need to remove the remains of the old one before putting on the new one, but what's left is not coming off easily.  Any suggestions on the proper way to remove it?  Naphtha, perhaps?
#2

Are you asking about the Philco logo decal on the front of the cabinet or the Philco model # label on the tube shield? I think the model # label would soften up with isopropyl alcohol though I haven't done it.  If its the front decal, then I assume you are not refinishing the cabinet and are just trying to take off the decal.  I've done that once on a 42-322 cabinet using GOJO (without pumice) and 0000 steel wool to gently take off the decals.  I was lucky and they came off without making any visible difference in the finish...that may not be possible in all cases.  Others may have other approaches.
#3

I'm talking about the decal on the back of the chassis that has the model type and a bunch of patent numbers.

Edit: Specifically, I'm talking about the gold toned one in the upper right: http://www.vintageradiolabels.com/philco-model-71.html
#4

(11-22-2014, 06:40 PM)captainslack Wrote:  I'm talking about the decal on the back of the chassis that has the model type and a bunch of patent numbers.

Edit: Specifically, I'm talking about the gold toned one in the upper right: http://www.vintageradiolabels.com/philco-model-71.html

I removed one w/ a blade of a knife as seen in this thread - http://antiqueradios.com/forums/viewtopi...6&t=253316

I later had it laminated and glued back. That part is in the thread there as well.

I then tried same method on a different radio and it didn't go so well. I stopped and then just covered it w/ clear packing tape.
#5

Acetone would probably get the old label off. But that stuff is very strong and should be used outdoors while wearing good rubber gloves and a respirator. Always think of your health first before using harsh chemicals!

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
The speaker table error?
G  10-1/2"       65, 76, 87, 95 Push-Pull 45's 2766 0.7 550 3200 H   10-1/2"    77, 96 Push-Pull...morzh — 09:26 PM
A Marconi model 86
I have a Stromberg, one of the early ones, seems early 30s. This is what I call a back breaker. None of the early Philc...morzh — 08:28 PM
A Marconi model 86
A backbreaker.....PaulPaul Philco322 — 08:12 PM
A Marconi model 86
>>What a behemoth! A Juggernaut.morzh — 07:47 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
I am not sure I understood about the coils and the mush. I looked an more than one coil in 20, 70, 90, 60, Zeniths and ...morzh — 07:46 PM
A Marconi model 86
:e_biggrin: What a behemoth!  I hope the final result is as much a quality sounding example!  Keep us posted on your pro...GarySP — 07:32 PM
A Marconi model 86
I should add that the double conversion may only be used on the shortwave bands, but I haven't looked at the schematic t...Arran — 07:27 PM
Philco 70 antenna lead
Yes, that wire will not pick up much interference as routed - the RF at that level won't be affected, and if you have st...radio1 — 07:26 PM
Philco model 60
I'm also a member of MARC. Did you attend the Vintage Electronics Expo in Waterford, MI last month? That's where I got...GarySP — 07:22 PM
A Marconi model 86
Dan Double conversion is using two IF converters instead of one. This improves the image response. morzh — 07:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3470 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 3467 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>