Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

42-350 Alignment question
#1

I just finished putting together the 42-350 I have been recapping and rewiring for a long time. I had lots of problems due to some wiring mistakes I made early on when my notes were wrong, and those mistakes caused other problems that were hard to find and fix. Thanks to Ron Ramirez, planigan, Steve in Missouri, exray, and any others who helped me with these problems.

The upshot is that the radio now works great. I aligned the IF, and I get great reception. Yesterday around dusk I picked up strong broadcasts from Boston and Philadelphia, quite a few stations all across the SW band, and even, faintly, two local FM stations on the old prewar FM band. (I can't remember the explanation for this--something about oscillator harmonics.)

My question involves the compensators for aligning the tuning to the numbers on the dial glass. On this radio the dial glass is attached to the cabinet, not to the chassis, so it seems like the alignment must be done with the chassis in place in the cabinet, but most of the RF compensators are at the front of the chassis where they are really hard to reach with the chassis installed. Does anyone have any suggestions for aligning this set? "Just try harder" would work, I guess, but I wondered if anyone has a hint I don't know about.

I did have a thought of making marks on the back of the pointer assembly when the pointer aligns with the required frequencies on the glass, and then pulling the chassis and the loop antenna out to the bench to adjust the compensators to those marks, but that's the only idea I have.

The only other problem is that the hum seems greater than on my other Philcos, especially from the rear of the set. I don't notice it when I am listening across the room, but it is pretty noticeable when I am tuning and adjusting it. I tried a couple of different speakers (same type) and reversed the field coil leads and also the voice coil leads, but there was no change either way.

John Honeycutt
#2

Hmmm, as far as dial alignment on this type of set. I remove the glass and approximate it on the front. Works for me Icon_wink

-Brian
If you collect or are interested in antique telephones, please visit Classic Rotary Phones
http://www.classicrotaryphones.com/forum/index.php




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 41-608 changer coupler
Thanks, Morzh. That solves the issue of the rubber pieces. Now, I need to find a way to replicate the pot metal piec...alangard — 05:07 PM
12' Philco
If it is 12', either Kareem or Andre would have to jump pretty high to look at the front panel. Kareem would have an e...morzh — 01:48 PM
12' Philco
And here's a story about the tires on the truck. Same "no-stoop" guy must have installed these! Take care a...GarySP — 01:17 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
I think they have only shown the secondaries of the transformer. Two of them feed the rectifiers' filaments.morzh — 12:58 PM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Arran If the wire inside cans is the gauges you mentioned, the sole reason for that would be mechanical, to stiffen t...morzh — 12:56 PM
12' Philco
Rod, Yes, I know, but the Giant Philco is not around anymore either, so I go by whoever was alive fairly recently. H...morzh — 12:54 PM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Absolutely no one is going to reverse engineer that circuit. Even the iron core is missing.RodB — 10:37 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
Thanks to both members for your help regarding wire and tuner mtg supports. regards--Johngeorgetownjohn — 09:33 AM
Hickok AC51 tube tester
Note that no power cord, power switch, or power transformer switch are shown. That (along with my experience with full s...DaleHCook — 07:09 AM
IF can wire size and Rubber mounts?
A pair of wire strippers can give you an idea of what the existing gauge of the wire leads are in the IF can, I think it...Arran — 06:07 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 5177 online users. [Complete List]
» 2 Member(s) | 5175 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatar

>