Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

42-1008P What is this?
#1

Looks like on capcitor 8a. Almost like they lost the washer and put in place some bandage type material.

This can't be stock but how does this happen???

[Image: http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b519...252691.jpg]
#2

Looks like they lost the mica insulator and put in a rag. People have "rigged" things in worse ways.

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/
#3

(11-02-2014, 12:17 PM)Phlogiston Wrote:  Looks like they lost the mica insulator and put in a rag. People have "rigged" things in worse ways.

But its only where the washer should be. That I can tell anyway.
#4

(11-02-2014, 11:36 PM)Edisla Wrote:  
(11-02-2014, 12:17 PM)Phlogiston Wrote:  Looks like they lost the mica insulator and put in a rag. People have "rigged" things in worse ways.

But its only where the washer should be. That I can tell anyway.

SO I took that gauze out and put a metal washer in place like the other and I couldn't tune in anything. It was shorting or something.

I then put in a fiber washer and all was fine.

Did this variable originally have some none metallic washer???
#5

Can't tell from picture, but if it seems to be a structural support that needs to be insulated from the basket, as stators often are, a ceramic insulator would be best, (and replace missing scrrew?) but if you can trace the schematic and logic leads you to conclude it is a trimmer capacitor gone missing, well that's another story. Also could be unneeded (duplicate) connection to the stator. Dunno.
#6

I'll post a pic shortly but something just seems off w/ this 8, 8A variable cap.
#7
Photo 

So here is part 8, 8A

8 is at bottom and 8A is top.

8 has one terminal and 8A has two.

Where a second terminal on 8 would be is not there but the folded over metal on that side looks like it would be touching the mounting bracket.

The mounting bracket is connected to the chassis on each end. If it is in fact touching I don't see how that is good.

That and the threaded brass sections look VERY close to the bracket if not touching already. If those two caps are connecting together via the screw mounts I don't see how that can be good.

ignore the one variables missing screw I was checking something when I took pic.

[Image: http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b519...1431fe.jpg]

Looking it over further its probably just me not understanding the construction of these parts. I think its clearing up a bit.

Still not sure why a metal washer on the one seemed to be shorting out.

Investigating further.
#8

Ok so I'm guessing I was right in putting the non conductive washer on this screw for 8A or you will short one of the sections to ground. Schematic shows no ground on 8A that I can see.

Anyone have a 42-1008, 42-1009 on the bench they can look at the washers for those to caps?
#9

I don't have one of those models, but looking at the schematic, one end of (8 ) is clearly connected to ground while (8A) is ungrounded. So it makes sense that (8A) requires a non-conductive washer under the screw. The screw and its bushing are grounded. If the screw (or a metal washer under it) touches the plate of the trimmer, it grounds it. So, yes...a non-metallic (plastic) washer is required here.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#10

(02-12-2015, 08:15 AM)Ron Ramirez Wrote:  I don't have one of those models, but looking at the schematic, one end of (8 ) is clearly connected to ground while (8A) is ungrounded. So it makes sense that (8A) requires a non-conductive washer under the screw. The screw and its bushing are grounded. If the screw (or a metal washer under it) touches the plate of the trimmer, it grounds it. So, yes...a non-metallic (plastic) washer is required here.

Exactly.

I'm guessing at some point the original washer deteriorated and someone put in that bandage looking material to keep it from shorting.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Hi Morzh, May be a good idea to remove the cone to prevent damage. You may have to do so anyway to remove the pole ...MrFixr55 — 08:44 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I think that Danaher, the company that owns Beckman-Coulter (the company that I worked for 41 years) owns Fluke. They a...MrFixr55 — 08:35 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Rod I wish... :lol: I am not sure I'd buy the Fluke, had it not fell in my lap for free. $500 to $800...it's a lot...morzh — 08:09 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Mike, ...you get a commission?RodB — 07:52 PM
New member
Hi. I specialize in refurbishing Predictas, but I'm in Chicago. If you can get it to me, I'd be happy to go over it. ...Bob Andersen — 06:43 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
I have 3 G speaker, all with open Field coils. Today I pull one of the shelf and decided to try to remove the FC (spo...morzh — 06:07 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Thanks Mike. I will check them out.dconant — 05:52 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
There is no such thing as bad Fluke. This said, they are expensive. A Fluke is easily 10x the price of comparable CCC...morzh — 05:45 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Hello Mike, Yes, I have 3 Fluke meters one being my first Fluke 77 and other being Fluke 87. My third is Fluke clamp -...radiorich — 05:04 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I knew that Fluke was the Cadillac so with that in mind what Fluke would you recommend I get?dconant — 03:53 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>