Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

42-1008P What is this?
#1

Looks like on capcitor 8a. Almost like they lost the washer and put in place some bandage type material.

This can't be stock but how does this happen???

[Image: http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b519...252691.jpg]
#2

Looks like they lost the mica insulator and put in a rag. People have "rigged" things in worse ways.

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/
#3

(11-02-2014, 12:17 PM)Phlogiston Wrote:  Looks like they lost the mica insulator and put in a rag. People have "rigged" things in worse ways.

But its only where the washer should be. That I can tell anyway.
#4

(11-02-2014, 11:36 PM)Edisla Wrote:  
(11-02-2014, 12:17 PM)Phlogiston Wrote:  Looks like they lost the mica insulator and put in a rag. People have "rigged" things in worse ways.

But its only where the washer should be. That I can tell anyway.

SO I took that gauze out and put a metal washer in place like the other and I couldn't tune in anything. It was shorting or something.

I then put in a fiber washer and all was fine.

Did this variable originally have some none metallic washer???
#5

Can't tell from picture, but if it seems to be a structural support that needs to be insulated from the basket, as stators often are, a ceramic insulator would be best, (and replace missing scrrew?) but if you can trace the schematic and logic leads you to conclude it is a trimmer capacitor gone missing, well that's another story. Also could be unneeded (duplicate) connection to the stator. Dunno.
#6

I'll post a pic shortly but something just seems off w/ this 8, 8A variable cap.
#7
Photo 

So here is part 8, 8A

8 is at bottom and 8A is top.

8 has one terminal and 8A has two.

Where a second terminal on 8 would be is not there but the folded over metal on that side looks like it would be touching the mounting bracket.

The mounting bracket is connected to the chassis on each end. If it is in fact touching I don't see how that is good.

That and the threaded brass sections look VERY close to the bracket if not touching already. If those two caps are connecting together via the screw mounts I don't see how that can be good.

ignore the one variables missing screw I was checking something when I took pic.

[Image: http://i1289.photobucket.com/albums/b519...1431fe.jpg]

Looking it over further its probably just me not understanding the construction of these parts. I think its clearing up a bit.

Still not sure why a metal washer on the one seemed to be shorting out.

Investigating further.
#8

Ok so I'm guessing I was right in putting the non conductive washer on this screw for 8A or you will short one of the sections to ground. Schematic shows no ground on 8A that I can see.

Anyone have a 42-1008, 42-1009 on the bench they can look at the washers for those to caps?
#9

I don't have one of those models, but looking at the schematic, one end of (8 ) is clearly connected to ground while (8A) is ungrounded. So it makes sense that (8A) requires a non-conductive washer under the screw. The screw and its bushing are grounded. If the screw (or a metal washer under it) touches the plate of the trimmer, it grounds it. So, yes...a non-metallic (plastic) washer is required here.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#10

(02-12-2015, 08:15 AM)Ron Ramirez Wrote:  I don't have one of those models, but looking at the schematic, one end of (8 ) is clearly connected to ground while (8A) is ungrounded. So it makes sense that (8A) requires a non-conductive washer under the screw. The screw and its bushing are grounded. If the screw (or a metal washer under it) touches the plate of the trimmer, it grounds it. So, yes...a non-metallic (plastic) washer is required here.

Exactly.

I'm guessing at some point the original washer deteriorated and someone put in that bandage looking material to keep it from shorting.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, give this site a look for your spider. Can't hurt. Take care and BE HEALTHY! -GaryGarySP — 12:41 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Rod, Bubble packaging? The one I know (if you mean the large bubble type) is really thin. I have some at home. Is there...morzh — 12:23 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Q8. What's the meaning of life? I have read that someone made a spider out of the clear plastic from bubble packagin...RodB — 11:07 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
So, Q1. Does anyone know where to get the spider. Q2. If there is no such place, what material is best? I doubt tin is...morzh — 09:43 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran The oxidation seems to go deep, a few layers. The break starts right there, but then it will occur on every la...morzh — 07:35 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike, This is just a thought, the are on the coil where the verdigris (green oxidation is) I wonder if that is where ...Arran — 06:32 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I've made a one or two spiders by using some card stock, and a razor blade, it took more then one try but they ...Arran — 05:48 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
I wondered about that. Wish there was some place local to get this stuff.dconant — 04:20 PM
Philco 89 indicator light.
Bending the lamp bracket (moving the lamp, that is) can possibly change the shape of the pointer a bit, but not its loca...morzh — 04:01 PM
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Because the usable power rating of it then is (3,200/20,000)*25W= 4W. Maybe a tad more due to the mass, but not much. Yo...morzh — 03:59 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 3957 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 3954 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>