Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RCA Q-103 tube ?
#16

(05-17-2016, 04:33 PM)Radioroslyn Wrote:  Well You could try tuning the bcb oscillator by monitoring it's signal in a well calibrated receiver. Use C-6 to set the osc signal heard in the well calibrated receiver at 1755kc (1300+455kc) with the dial set at 1300kc on the RCA. Same thing for the low end of the band. Use L-9 to set the osc heard in the well calibrated receiver at 1055kc (600+455kc) with the RCA dial set at 600kc. It's not uncommon to have so interaction between these two adjustment so you may have to adjust these a few times to get it on the nose. If you can't get the osc to tune from 1055 to 1755kc and your bandswitch is good and clean them I'd replace C-8 and C-11.
The other thing that comes to mind is interference from other electrical devices like cell phone/lap top chargers or computers. They use switching mode power supply and generate a lot of rf noise which can be very strong.

Terry
Set the radios up like you said the signal was picked up at 1755 and peaked using C6 and 1055 using L9 I would say it is a little better but still need to hook up my garage antenna to really get anything. 


Messages In This Thread
RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-06-2016, 03:00 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Phlogiston - 05-06-2016, 03:35 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Radioroslyn - 05-07-2016, 12:12 AM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-08-2016, 09:42 AM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Radioroslyn - 05-08-2016, 07:34 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-11-2016, 03:35 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Radioroslyn - 05-11-2016, 04:32 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-12-2016, 03:20 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Radioroslyn - 05-12-2016, 03:57 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-13-2016, 08:58 AM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-17-2016, 11:02 AM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Radioroslyn - 05-17-2016, 04:33 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-19-2016, 04:51 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-18-2016, 07:19 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Radioroslyn - 05-18-2016, 07:54 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-19-2016, 10:45 AM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Radioroslyn - 05-19-2016, 06:16 PM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Eric - 05-20-2016, 11:55 AM
RE: RCA Q-103 tube ? - by Radioroslyn - 05-20-2016, 09:16 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1949 Motorola 5A9M
bob  Nice work on battery . If you don't. Have terminals i have a few spares  Samsam — 02:12 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
hello mr Fixr, for sure !! I have some radios that I need to make some batteries for too. Sincerely richardradiorich — 12:33 AM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Dittos, sweet b on the battery. Love the "9 Lives" logo, remembered from my childhood. Other neat ones are t...MrFixr55 — 11:24 PM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
Hi Morzh, Dunno if the AC EMI caps are an issue. I never liked the concept but never had an issue with these causin...MrFixr55 — 11:21 PM
Philco 46-1209 strange behavior
And no hum without the 7AF7? Not common but I am thinking heater - cathode short. This would introduce hum in this sta...MrFixr55 — 11:14 PM
schematics
Those filter caps in the cardboard tube are easy to restuff, especially the kind with the rolled over end. You don't hav...Arran — 09:56 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
If you have 5 wires, do this: The wires that go to thick-wire wound winding are the filament. If you do not know wha...morzh — 09:03 PM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I recently acquired a Philco Model 16 Code 126. I removed the power transformer to place heat shrink on some very bad...bobclausen — 08:23 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Hello Bob, That battery looks great nice job ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 08:20 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Yes, I plan to put a Velcro closer on the top.klondike98 — 07:28 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>