Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L
#7

Popped off the dial to see how I could get it cleaner. Gave it a good scrubbing w/OMS and a lot of dirt came off but Ron was right in that the dial material has darken over the years. It also has something on it that doesn't particularly want to come very easily. It maybe some sort of mold or something. It leaves the dial spotty looking on an angle and feels rough. Can scrape with my fingernail but I don't want to remove the graphics in the process. Straight on it looks ok so I'll leave it. Need to take good care of this dial, don't think any repros are available! Gallery sez less than 1000 660/665L's where sold. Can't imagine why. Only seen 1 other on the web.
Under the chassis it originally had a heavy perforated cardboard cover, mine is missing.Kinda handy it missing as it gives you a pretty non obstructed access to the chassis innards just by moving the cabinet away from the wall. Chassis looks pretty unmolested but I can fix that!!!!! Looks like it was around when the house was being renovated back in '13-14 (really dusty inside).
Onward to the ohm meter!!!

Terry


Attached Files Image(s)
           


Messages In This Thread
Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 07:09 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 08:27 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 06-18-2016, 08:33 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 08:45 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 09:07 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 06-19-2016, 12:49 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-19-2016, 03:52 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-19-2016, 04:11 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-19-2016, 04:54 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-20-2016, 08:50 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-20-2016, 11:47 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-21-2016, 06:30 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-21-2016, 03:45 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-22-2016, 02:44 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-22-2016, 06:56 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-24-2016, 01:25 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-24-2016, 02:54 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-24-2016, 03:44 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 09:50 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-25-2016, 10:36 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 01:34 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 07:41 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-26-2016, 08:33 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-30-2016, 02:01 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-03-2016, 10:00 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-07-2016, 05:20 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-07-2016, 11:31 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Arran - 07-08-2016, 03:47 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-08-2016, 08:35 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 07-08-2016, 04:05 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-11-2016, 11:28 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by morzh - 07-11-2016, 11:43 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-11-2016, 12:10 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-20-2016, 06:07 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 07-20-2016, 08:26 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 07-20-2016, 09:40 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-20-2016, 10:04 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 07-20-2016, 10:52 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-27-2016, 05:16 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-27-2016, 07:39 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-28-2016, 07:22 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by morzh - 11-28-2016, 09:24 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-28-2016, 09:56 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 11-29-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-29-2016, 04:12 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-29-2016, 09:17 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 11:24 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 12:46 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 03:41 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 06:48 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 10:10 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-02-2016, 11:02 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by klondike98 - 12-02-2016, 11:30 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-03-2016, 03:32 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 12-03-2016, 03:53 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-03-2016, 04:51 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-03-2016, 05:00 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-03-2016, 09:26 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I was just reminded of something else, I'm not sure why but many Rogers built sets do seem to have open primari...Arran — 04:40 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1069 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 1065 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>