Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L
#13

Started to test the tubes and found that the 3-42's and the 75 where in good shape, 3 of the 78's weren't and the 77 was nothing brag about either. The rf amp tube 78 was replaced with a 77, it will work but it screws with the avc voltage as they have a different grid cutoff voltage. Found some better 78's and a new 77. Got to put 78's on my Ktown list.
Spun the chassis around to have a look at the dial mask and cap drive system. One of the reasons the dial was dim was:
    That's the front of the dial lamp.
Got the setscrew for the lower pulley(bandswitch) but the setscrew behind the dial is stuck tight, it's soaking in PB Blaster. Need to get all that part because fine tuning slips and it's gross/dirty.
Here's a few pics of the under side with the e caps rebuilt and the 42 socket replaced. Looks a little tidier as there where some old repairs (connecting new caps across the old) that are gone now.
Am waiting on an order from Sal's to come in with needed mylars. Should be here soon. Then I'll start on the Bakelite caps and resistors.

Terry


Attached Files Image(s)
       


Messages In This Thread
Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 07:09 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 08:27 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 06-18-2016, 08:33 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-18-2016, 08:45 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 09:07 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 06-19-2016, 12:49 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-19-2016, 03:52 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-19-2016, 04:11 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-19-2016, 04:54 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-20-2016, 08:50 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-20-2016, 11:47 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-21-2016, 06:30 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-21-2016, 03:45 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-22-2016, 02:44 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-22-2016, 06:56 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-24-2016, 01:25 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-24-2016, 02:54 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-24-2016, 03:44 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 09:50 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 06-25-2016, 10:36 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 01:34 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-25-2016, 07:41 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-26-2016, 08:33 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 06-30-2016, 02:01 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-03-2016, 10:00 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-07-2016, 05:20 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-07-2016, 11:31 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Arran - 07-08-2016, 03:47 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-08-2016, 08:35 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 07-08-2016, 04:05 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-11-2016, 11:28 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by morzh - 07-11-2016, 11:43 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-11-2016, 12:10 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-20-2016, 06:07 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by OldRestorer - 07-20-2016, 08:26 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 07-20-2016, 09:40 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 07-20-2016, 10:04 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 07-20-2016, 10:52 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-27-2016, 05:16 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-27-2016, 07:39 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-28-2016, 07:22 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by morzh - 11-28-2016, 09:24 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-28-2016, 09:56 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by sam - 11-29-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-29-2016, 04:12 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-29-2016, 09:17 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 11:24 AM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 12:46 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 11-30-2016, 03:41 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 06:48 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-01-2016, 10:10 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-02-2016, 11:02 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by klondike98 - 12-02-2016, 11:30 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-03-2016, 03:32 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by KCMike - 12-03-2016, 03:53 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-03-2016, 04:51 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Radioroslyn - 12-03-2016, 05:00 PM
RE: Big, Bad*s*, and ugly 660L - by Ron Ramirez - 12-03-2016, 09:26 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I was just reminded of something else, I'm not sure why but many Rogers built sets do seem to have open primari...Arran — 04:40 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1078 online users. [Complete List]
» 4 Member(s) | 1074 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar

>