Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 640 Shadowmeter Observations
#1

So I am in the final stages of wrapping up my Philco 640. The last thing I need to do is re-install the shadowmeter. The coil has continuity and I get 1,551 ohms. I’ve seen people on YouTube testing the action of the shadowmeter by hooking the coil up to a 9-volt battery. Here is what mine looks like performing that test:

https://youtu.be/q4uFXKMyKZs

Compared to other examples it does not appear that there is as much movement as there should be. I removed the coil and inspected the magnet. I was surprised to find it was a bar magnet.

[Image: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a241/J...uu1leu.jpg]

Other examples I have seen on websites and YouTube always showed a form of horseshoe magnet. I tested the magnetism at different locations with a paperclip and found one side to be a little stronger than the other. Seeing that it was a bar type magnet I purchased some Neodymium bar magnets off of eBay that were the same thickness, just a little wider and a little longer (eBay Item #321476074749):

[Image: http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a241/J...rp4gla.jpg]

I’ve seen people trying to re-magnetize the original magnet but did not try on mine since it does not seem to last that long (at least from what I have seen on YouTube).

I put one on the side of the shadowmeter housing but did not see much of a difference in meter movement. I then put two of them together and retested:

https://youtu.be/Xb_UX3i8RA0

Not bad. I’m debating whether to file down one of the magnets to the same size as the original and replace it or just leaving the two magnets in place. I think the first thing I’ll do is reinstall it and see how it works as is, then add magnets to the side as needed and see how it goes.


Messages In This Thread
Philco 640 Shadowmeter Observations - by Geoff - 06-26-2016, 04:10 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 91 Restore Code ??
Can someone tell me if my 42 tubes are connected triode or pentode in fixed or cathode bias? How could I tell by looking...dconant — 10:47 AM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
Hello David, that is great news about the tubes source being local ! Sounds like you got good start on the radio . ...radiorich — 09:41 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike; I've only run into a speaker with an open filed coil twice, and they were on newer speakers from the 1940s. One ...Arran — 12:48 AM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Arran Yes, this is my plan for now and what do I got to lose, this is not even the speaker from this radio, but one o...morzh — 10:44 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
Mike;  I would unwrap the field coil, and see if maybe there a break near one of the ends, like where the coil wire att...Arran — 10:23 PM
An attempt to remove the Field Coil from a G speaker
...and this is what I did. I fed a little LT into the screwholes with a small brush, and a little on the rim next to the...morzh — 09:52 PM
Philco 40-120C Restoration
I combined the two 40-120C threads together as we like to keep the discussion of the same radio together. It helps with...klondike98 — 09:36 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Just checked were I buy tubes price is four dollars. So living in Florid we have a local source for tubes. David    David — 09:14 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
The higher voltage may be due to higher mains voltage. My mains run 120-125AC when the set was new mains would be 110-11...David — 09:09 PM
Philco 40-120C Weak, Distorted Ouput
Thank you for your reply. I pulled a speaker from a Philco 41-221 and received the same result. I used a signal tracer t...bluecap — 08:45 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2304 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 2301 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>