Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

38-690 Back Cover
#8

As I recall, Eddie set things up only to have someone from the West Coast (do not remember who) chime in that he was tooling up to make backs. Eddie backed off...and the other guy made a few backs for himself and some friends, and that was the end of it.

Edit: It was a fellow calling himself "shutterdialradio". His repro backs looked very nice.
http://antiqueradios.com/forums/viewtopi...7&t=223594

Edit #2: Upon reading all of the posts slowly instead of speed-reading as I do all too often, "shutterdialradio" made it very clear that he was only making a very limited run of a few backs in his posts and never promised to go into production. I wanted to be sure and mention this. I'm not trying to bad-mouth anyone, I certainly have no ax to grind in this topic. I like and respect Eddie, I don't know shutterdialradio but he seems to be one of the good guys also.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
38-690 Back Cover - by Jim - 07-07-2016, 12:21 AM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by KCMike - 07-07-2016, 07:38 AM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by klondike98 - 07-07-2016, 08:16 AM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by sam - 07-07-2016, 12:22 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by jerryhawthorne - 07-07-2016, 05:00 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by gregb - 07-07-2016, 05:48 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by jerryhawthorne - 07-07-2016, 06:35 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by Ron Ramirez - 07-07-2016, 08:20 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by Paul Philco322 - 07-10-2016, 11:07 AM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by gregb - 07-10-2016, 11:23 AM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by jerryhawthorne - 07-10-2016, 01:47 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by sam - 07-10-2016, 01:53 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by Ron Ramirez - 07-10-2016, 02:09 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by sam - 07-10-2016, 06:53 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by PhilcoPhan1936 - 09-22-2017, 11:09 PM
RE: 38-690 Back Cover - by Ron Ramirez - 09-23-2017, 07:19 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RpdB I don't think there's much difference with interstage transformers of different models other than dimersion...Vlad95 — 03:27 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I looks like your set has the same problem that mine did, both a bad output transformer, and a bad audio inters...Arran — 03:21 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Ouch! Not often the secondary takes a hit. Wish there was a better solution. I have a good interstage transformer but it...RodB — 02:59 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
By the way, the bypass you suggested is a rare solution in some circuits. For example, this schematics solution is used...Vlad95 — 01:43 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
No, you are wrong, because you did not know the details. Unfortunately, only ONE winding out of six is intact in both t...Vlad95 — 01:14 PM
Rogers Majestic R-646
The output 45s are still in push-pull because the transformer secondary winding is still in the grid circuit providing o...RodB — 11:52 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Thanks RodB for the help. But this is not a real solution to this situation, not even a temporary one. Because the firs...Vlad95 — 11:34 AM
Philco Model 16 wiring question
I was going to check the voltages as you suggested and hooked it up to my dim bulb. It appears I have a short. The bul...bobclausen — 10:34 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
You can bypass the interstage transformer by disconnecting the primary, connect a load resistor of about 10k - 20k to th...RodB — 09:40 AM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
So, here's Prince on stage halfway through Purple Rain when he stoops down to his tech and says "Rod, pull out that...RodB — 09:17 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1018 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1017 Guest(s)
Avatar

>